If you expect the best of the best, this is NOT THE ONE. The old adage "you get what you pay for” applies here too. While the stats seem impressive, the color reproduction and pixels per inch are not. It's an amazingly big screen, we can all read the stats, but having it on the table surprised me with its sheer size. Well it isn't. In the end, the screen needs to be somewhere in the middle between the resolution - or the best pixels per inch (ppi/dpi) for the intended viewing distance. On a regular desk, you'll be sitting pretty close to it, and if you have very good eyesight and expect it to look like a Surface Laptop 2 or similar, you'll be disappointed. I have another Samsung 34" WQHD (so it's a bit shorter than full 4K but full 4K wide) - and I like it a lot more and almost double the price of this screen here I think, now I know where the price difference comes from The problem can be worse if you use a setting higher than 100% dpi in Windows. Now that has a couple of good points. The price, the curvature chosen looks square, the port count is good, the rear one Port cover Overall a bit "cheap plastic" but that doesn't really bother - it's very light If you just want an office screen or really just want a giant screen so you can fit more content and still display it at a 200% dpi setting make it more accessible to people with less than perfect eyesight then this is a very good screen It's not a glowing review but I also chose to leave it which means it's not scr is gross, just not the best.
Samsung Flat Monitor Super Slim Design 27", 1920X1080P, 75Hz, Flicker Free
112 Review
LG 27MP59G-P 27 inch Monitor with FreeSync, 75Hz Refresh Rate, and 1080p HD Resolution
93 Review
🖥️ Revolutionize Your Interface with Planar PXL2230MW 22 Inch 16 Touchscreen
97 Review
Sceptre C325B-144R: Advanced FreeSync HD Display with Wall Mounting and Tilt Adjustment
94 Review