Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Haruto Asahi ᠌ photo
Tokyo
1 Level
103 Review
147 Karma

Review on Canon EOS 6D Wi-Fi Enabled Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) with 20.2 MP CMOS Sensor and 3.0-Inch LCD by Haruto Asahi ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not worth the money, I will not advise this product.

There is no other option if you are packed in very closely on a canon system and you require a folding screen. When switching to another system, you run the risk of losing money, and when shooting with Sony L glasses while wearing crutches, you run the risk of losing both speed and accuracy. The advantages of it include the following: 1. Flip screen! Up until now, this Canon full-frame model is the only one available with a screen that flips out. A very helpful piece of equipment for those who work in photography and videography. And this is the primary benefit it offers. If you like to take creative photos, the 6D MK2 is without a doubt the camera for you. 2. The independence of the battery! The Sony UPCs are simply a magnitude or two behind the competition. 3. Canon has maintained that it is their signature color. You can get some delicious fried skinton here. 4. Availability. Price. 5. There is now a larger quantity of megapixels available. Beneficial to plant growth. 6. Color reproduction remains consistent up to an ISO of 20,000 7. Autofocus that is more rapid than on the 6D and the 5D Mark3. 8. a compact nature That of the weight. 9 . Video stabilization. ten. When compared to 6D and 5D3, overexposures are highlighted more prominently; this is the primary problem with canon cameras. 11. Additional protection against dust and moisture 12. Using dual pixels in LV in tracking mode is a neat feature. The following are some of its negative aspects: 1. One card slot 2. The cumbersome process of synchronization via wi-fi. Tuning in can be accomplished more quickly through the use of NFS or Bluetooth. 3. Noises! Surprisingly, you can see them even when the ISO is set to 1000 even when they are in the shadows. A minor source of annoyance. On the other hand, whereas the color started to degrade on the first six at an ISO of 10,000, it does not do so on this one until it reaches an ISO of 20,000. You are also able to reduce the amount of noise. 4. Points of focus that are located closer to the center. Focus suffers a drop of 5D mark4 5. the slowest possible shutter speed when using a flash with a speed sync mode of 1/180. 6. Shutter limit 1/4000 7. The video stabilization feature is only available for branded eyewear. 8. Surprisingly enough, the cost of it all This has a positive impact as well as a negative one. In addition to this, if you own a park of optics manufactured by Canon. It would be a complete and utter waste of time to switch to Sony and sell everything. Since the minus and the analogues from Nikon have the same price, it is more prudent to purchase Nikon equipment if one is beginning from scratch. 9 . Weak buffer 10. More specifically, there is a front focus in the model that I have! It is necessary to make adjustments for each lens. Even relatives! 11. To be more specific, the autofocus indication in LV with native L-glasses does not work in my carcass! When glasses are worn that are not naturally worn by the wearer, communication with the camera is lost (the problem manifests itself in the flash mode). 12. No 4K 13. Full HD is only appropriate for close-up shots of people because people are so interesting! Canon is still the same "soap" in terms of common funds, and it loses out to Panasonic and Sony in terms of detail. 14. Weak DD. When there aren't any major obstacles between the darkest and brightest parts of the frame, the HDR photography software on a smartphone can take beautiful pictures. This is a complete and utter mess! :( 15. Moisture protection was added, that much is true, but nobody is entirely sure why, and this is the second 6D2 carcass that has dust particles on the matrix (visible through JVI and in LV mode). An older 6D, on which I have changed the lenses of my glasses one thousand times, does not have this issue. 16. Regardless of how obvious a drawback this may be, the volume of files has increased to 30-32 mb, compared to 23-25 mb for the 6D. 17. Outdated software cannot recognize the Raw format produced by the camera. VSCO does not see the camera profile in the "camera calibration" block of Lightroom, and as a result, the preset that works well on the 6D does not work well on the 6D2. 18. However, the focus is still relatively poor when viewed through the viewfinder. A large number of failures when tracking!

Similar reviews