Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
silicon power jewel flash sp064gbuf3j80v1tej logo

Silicon Power Jewel Flash SP064GBUF3J80V1TEJ Review

4

·

Very good

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
4.0
💾 USB Flash Drives, 💾 Data Storage

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Silicon Power Jewel Flash SP064GBUF3J80V1TEJ
img 2 attached to Silicon Power Jewel Flash SP064GBUF3J80V1TEJ
img 3 attached to Silicon Power Jewel Flash SP064GBUF3J80V1TEJ
img 4 attached to Silicon Power Jewel Flash SP064GBUF3J80V1TEJ

Photos by authors

(1)
img 5 attached to Silicon Power Jewel Flash SP064GBUF3J80V1TEJ

Details

ColorTitanium
Memory Storage Capacity64 GB
BrandSilicon Power
Hardware InterfaceUSB 3.0

Description of Silicon Power Jewel Flash SP064GBUF3J80V1TEJ

Exquisite metallic casing, showing the modern fashion style. Circular-shaped design, , perfectly fitted on a keychain. SuperSpeed USB 3.0 interface, backward compatible with USB 2.0. Work with PCs and Macs, letting you to share files between different platforms. High durability with waterproof, dustproof and vibration-proof protections. Sandblasting surface treatment, enabling superior resistance to scratches and fingerprints. PCs and Macs ready. Backed by lifetime warranty that guarantees complete services and technical support.

Reviews

Global ratings 4
  • 5
    2
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Controller: Phison PS2309 Possible Memory Chip(s): Not available Flash ID: 983C98B3 76E3 Chip F/W: 08.37.5D Firmware Date: 2022-04-27 ID_BLK Ver. : 1.5.8.0 MP Ver. : MPALL v52022.00 VID: 13FE PID: 6300 manufacturer: Product: USB DISK 3.0 Query Vendor ID: Query Product ID: USB DISK 3.0 Query Product Revision: PMAP Physical Disk Capacity: 31029460992 Bytes Windows Disk Capacity: 31010975744 Bytes Tags: 2Q2P-SX9J File System: NTFS Relative Offset: 18048 KB USB Version: 3.00 in 2.00 port Declared…

Pros
  • - Appearance - Metal case - Read speed up to 215MB/s CrystalDiskMark 7.0.0 x64 - USB 2.0 NTFS 4KB - * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes [read] Sequential 1MiB (Q=8, T=1): 34.392 MB/s [32.8 IOPS] <2376462022 us> Sequential 1MiB (Q=1, T=1): 3420222 MB/s [32.6 IOPS] <30570.88 us> Random 4KiB (Q=32, T=16): 6.368 MB/s [1554.7 IOPS] <142980.99 us> Random 4KiB (Q=1, T=1): 4.743 MB/s [1158.0 IOPS] <860.92 us> Profile: Default Test: 8 GiB (x1) [Interval: 5 sec] <DefaultAffinity=DISABLED> Date: 2022/08/22 18:28:23 - USB 3.0 NTFS 4KB - [read] Sequential 1MiB (Q=8, T=1): 215.406 MB/s [205.4 IOPS] <38788.99 us> Sequential 1MiB (Q=1, T=1): 211.780 MB/s [202.0 IOPS] <4945.38 us> Random 4KiB (Q=32, T=16): 13.490 MB/s [3293.5 IOPS] <95016.36 us> Random 4KiB (Q=1, T=1): 8.564 MB/s [2090.8 IOPS] <475.97 us> Profile: Default Test: 8 GiB (x1) [Interval: 5 sec] <DefaultAffinity=DISABLED> Date: 2022/08/22 19:03:49 OS: Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
Cons
  • - The speed of recording stars from the sky is not enough, but it will be slightly higher than that of the M01 and M50 models CrystalDiskMark 7.0.0 x64 - USB 2.0 NTFS 4KB - * MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s] * KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes [write] Sequential 1MiB (Q=8, T=1): 720220 MB/s [6.8 IOPS] <599630.76 us> Sequential 1MiB (Q=1, T=1): 7.760 MB/s [7.4 IOPS] <82755.70 us> Random 4KiB (Q=32, T=16): 0.001 MB/s [0.2 IOPS] <1349266.56 us> Random 4KiB (Q=1, T=1): 0.003 MB/s [0.7 IOPS] <6697972022 us> Profile: Default Test: 8 GiB (x1) [Interval: 5 sec] <DefaultAffinity=DISABLED> Date: 2022/08/22 18:28:23 - USB 3.0 NTFS 4KB - [write] Sequential 1MiB (Q=8, T=1): 2022223 MB/s [19.2 IOPS] <386386.77 us> Sequential 1MiB (Q=1, T=1): 12.373 MB/s [11.8 IOPS] <69545.36 us> Random 4KiB (Q=32, T=16): 0.002 MB/s [0.5 IOPS] <2112591.33 us> Random 4KiB (Q=1, T=1): 0.004 MB/s [1.0 IOPS] <7069712022 us> Profile: Default Test: 8 GiB (x1) [Interval: 5 sec] <DefaultAffinity=DISABLED> Date: 2022/08/22 19:03:49 OS: Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

Revainrating 2 out of 5

So-so quality, price doesn't match quality.

It takes a very long time to be determined by the system . I tried to use it on different computers, about 20 different ones, both laptops and desktops. As I did not dance with a tambourine, I did not succeed in increasing and stabilizing the speed. This 3.0 works worse than the same 64 GB 2.0 flash drive. She ended up dying a few months later. I do not recommend!

For those who claim a read speed of 30 MB / s or less, I can say the following: at first I was also surprised by the low read speed, but then I looked at the measurements of other people and realized that something was wrong here. Many in the statistics had a speed of 100-180 MB / s. Then I just plugged the flash drive into the rear USB 3.0comnnector and got thecomveted 180 MB / s (here is my test result ). If you want a proper speed test, use only the rearcomnnectors.

Pros
  • Sturdy, no unnecessary moving parts, normal speed performance, worth the money
Cons
  • Very compact (easy to lose if not attached to something)