Review on Hankook Tire Kinergy Eco K425 195/65 R15 91T summer by Bogdan Atanasov ᠌

I skated about 20,000 on it. I’ll tell you about this rubber in comparison with the Michelin energy saver, which took about 80,000 km in 5 years. My car is a Kia seed 1.6 size 195/65/15. , passes joints better, passes puddles better, there is almost no aquaplaning (at least until new). on the road these tires are minimal, I think an ordinary participant in the movement will not notice. (for me) this is an expense, although they seem to be Eco, but the consumption compared to Michelin has increased by 0.5 liters per hundred approximately, you can save if you vomit on the highway 90 km / h, the costs are the same with Michelin. Well, mileage, according to reviews, the tire runs about 50-60 thousand km, less than Michelin. And then I calculated their price Hankuk-2900s, Michelin-3600s. 60000km overpay about 11000t. r! !! And earlier by 20t. km. you change them. Tires come out not at all budgetary, much more expensive than a well-known manufacturer. CONCLUSION: if tire mileage is important to you, profitability, then Michelin is better (they come out cheaper), if you want a LITTLE quieter, LITTLE softer and like to drive through deep puddles, then you can take these. Once again, the difference is not very big in handling and comfort and it’s not critical. But I’ll probably take Michelin next time, the “budget” Hankuk is too expensive)))) Good luck to everyone on the road! !!