Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 39
  • 5
    24
  • 4
    10
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

I quickly switched into my winter boots and drove the 450 kilometers to the north. The temperature went from +14 degrees Celsius to -1 degrees Celsius, and it rained with snow, yet the tires never gave any indication that they were unable to handle the conditions. Speed ranging from 90 to 115 kilometers per hour. I was prepared to respond to the destruction of the automobile in the corners, but it turned out that it wasn't necessary for me to do so. Despite the fact that she has previously been

Pros
  • Affordable and high-quality tires
Cons
  • The first summer was full with activity.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Quality at zero, very sorry for the money spent.

In general, in the few days that I drove it, the sensation that I bought a true China did not leave me. I was able to save 15% of the price of my previous wheels, which suit me on all counts, with the possible exception of wear rate. I believe that these wheels are a China. After a few days, I changed my mind and chose to return it in order to get wheels that had stood the test of time and were a perfect fit for me, despite the fact that I had overpaid for them. You can safely take it if you…

Pros
  • I decided to replace the Bridgestone my-02 tires that were rolled for the season on an Audi A3 with a set of 225/45 R17 tires, which I purchased. It's nice to ride on a not very bumpy road even on a low profile, the feeling of softness, as if I put the rubber on a higher profile. From the positive moments in the first days of riding after the bridge: - soft and quiet, after a little break-in - behaves well in the rain, although there is clearly no advantage over bridgestone in this regard - behaves well when braking, although it is foolish to expect otherwise, after all, not the cheapest rubber
Cons
  • The advantages come to an end with its smoothness and relative quietness when traveling at modest speeds. - It is very evident that the speed index V does not correspond to reality; at a speed of 200 kilometers per hour, the vehicle acts as though the wheels are flat, and there is no clarity of control. After crossing the bridge, the difference is readily apparent. During warm and especially hot weather, the rubber will become excessively pliable, giving the impression that you are still driving in the winter. This sensation will not go away. Due to the fact that rubber does not possess any elasticity, despite the fact that it is a soft material, tearing off a piece of rubber from the side caused a hernia to form when it was driven into a hole at 15 kilometers per hour. It has been brought to my attention that this gaping hole may be found in the yard, and I wish to point out that I drove my car over it without incident on bridgestone for an entire year. When I bought two wheels, one of them turned out to be defective; the rubber was bent, and it did not balance in any manner on the disk. However, even after the alteration was made without any questions being asked, questions regarding the quality of these wheels began to arise.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

With an open window it is definitely noisy, but not to the point of paranoia. It typically slows down in the range of 10 to 30, so you just need to understand that no one has canceled the laws of physics. Of course that is true. Different cars also have different noise. Rubber's braking characteristics alter when the surroundings undergoes a considerable change. Yes, the braking abilities start to decline after +30–35 and below 10–5, but the brain must also be activated. Declining, but within…

Pros
  • In general, fairly comfy tires, but in the rain on the water 100-120 like on rails (pah pah, don't jinx it).
Cons
  • It's still noisy, so you may choose between comfort and safety.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, it's nice to use.

The ABS worked for a split second when I slammed on the brakes from 60 km/h on the same road (city, freshly laid asphalt) when it was dry, but when I did the same thing in the rain (ideal conditions for aquaplaning), the ABS didn't turn on at all, and the car came to a stop as if a pillar had been driven into the ground in front of it. After checking to see if the bumper had been entangled in the asphalt. When the first snow fell, I got soaked and had to drive home through it. I was careful and

Pros
  • Superb grip on a variety of road conditions. On city streets, rural highways, and dirt paths. You can stop even more safely on wet roads than you do on dry ones.
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I recommend to buy, the product is of high quality.

In overall, the tires are fantastic if you avoid driving on gravel roads after rain, earning a solid 4! The pavement feels great, especially when it's wet. Nearly inaudible. Operation for four seasons was highly worthwhile. Despite the fact that we traveled outside the Hong Kong region, there were no hernias. Anyone who has ever driven down the Shilovsky highway in the vicinity of Hong Kong would comprehend.

Pros
  • Driving on wet pavement and braking on dry and wet pavement both with no noise. affordable pricing.
Cons
  • Rubber for dry soil and asphalt. Even with a manual transmission, wet grass and moist clay soil cause slipping.

It is already late spring, and the idea of switching from the flawlessly bumpy Amtel Planet DC to a different rubber has arisen. Better. Furthermore, the toad is crushing. Because of this, I learned that BFGoodrich makes vehicle tires. Rubber "dzhypovyh" blood - you have to take, I think the price is fair. Please don't dzhYp the car; I'd like to keep the rubber on the road. Tires were replaced for the summer, and the result was a set of 195/65R15 BFGoodrich G-Grip 95T XLs (with this index it…

Pros
  • Price. Get some rest in the car. Appearance. "Jeep" breed (I always assumed BFGoodrich was just the best tire brand for deep muck). Not manufactured in the USA (a positive feature thus far). And that includes pools of water.
Cons
  • Noise? I wouldn't go that far. Please see the following for further explanation.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

The road keeps super, that on dry, that on wet pavement. A clear steering wheel, goes strictly in a straight line, does not chat anywhere, as they say zero on the steering wheel, not like Nokian, which always floats with soft sidewalls (I won’t even compare Kumho, Cordiant and Amtel), a good reaction to turning the steering wheel. Optimal stiffness, not too hard and not too soft. I also noticed a slight decrease in fuel consumption. There is no tendency to hydroplaning. In the city in the rain…

Pros
  • On March 5, 2022, I installed this tire, size 185/60 r14, on a Daewoo Nexia car. Immediate impressions are only positive. I used to go on various tires, such as Nokian, Gislaved, Kumho, Kordiant, Amtel. But I liked this one the most. More details in the comments.
Cons
  • Well, if only the first 500 km. buzzed, but after running it became quieter.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not exactly what I wanted, but basically everything is fine.

I don't think it should be in this price range. Compare this rubber to Chinese counterparts (some will probably be better). In general, I regret that I bought it. Size 225/55/16. With its pros: I read previous reviews and can’t believe my eyes, what can I like about this rubber ? Is it just a good rubber only for the city. Has some cons: On the track in hot summer weather and speeds over 130-140 km. H. behaves unpredictably. Hydroplaning is pronounced. Very soft sidewalls, you have to swing…

Opel Astra H bought at the summer Premium Contact 2022. I pierced the shoulder area of ​​the front wheel and decided to take it as a set. Bought for 3150 for a wheel 205 55 r16. I left the wheel for nothing and the noise of the wheels upset me, but the rain and slush and 1000 km of running fixed everything. The noise has decreased a little, the tires have become softer, and the rutting of the road has disappeared. It is pleasant to steer on this rubber, fines have just begun to come.

Pros
  • Rut on the road is not felt. Rain and sleet do not notice on it. Breaks bumps gently
Cons
  • Noisy on normal pavement, if on the new it is already quiet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Got it with the car. Very surprised by the quality of the tires! The best I have ever used. Due to wear and tear, I bought Yokohama S. Drive in return - I fell for the Japanese "quality" (now I drive like with dying wheel bearings, although they are all in good order). I will leave this season and take the same Goodrich again! With its pros: Very quiet, absolutely not sensitive to the track, the car is like on rails. Cons below: Weak sides. I caught a hernia (but in fairness I’ll say that our…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I took tires 195/65 p15. Were installed on the Nissan Vingroad in the 12th body. Skated a total of 4 seasons with a mileage of about 13,000 km per season, i. E. about 52022 km. The tires were used mercilessly - driving on the highway in conditions of heat and rain, also in the city and on light off-road without fanaticism. For all the time of operation, it has never failed anywhere, braking and control are adequate, everything else depends on the gasket between the steering wheel and the seat…

Pros
  • Moderately rigid, durable sidewall, well drains water
Cons
  • did not reveal

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

I bought a summer Boris Fedorych. Previously, I did not suspect that goodrichs are also for passenger cars. Ran about 3000 km on this rubber. The rubber swallows small bumps well, there are no problems with run-ins on well hatches either. The steering wheel is responsive, not wadded. If you drive on a very smooth canvas, then the wheels are not audible at all. I have not tested it in specific puddles yet, but judging by some reviews, this rubber behaves quite tolerably in water. I can not…

Pros
  • price-quality ratio
Cons
  • not revealed yet

producer Poland, high-quality tires, cannot be compared with 2022s. now on a small car, Toyota fancarg-yaris, I don’t drive 100-130 much - everything is fine. Before that, I only took Japanese tires. 2022s somehow took a couple - chtoli cordiant, back. exploded on a gravel road so that the outer surface of the tire almost overtook the wheelbarrow - it completely flew off and rolled, the bead remained on the disk. You can't take 2022s if you don't want problems. save some, and then the…

Pros
  • qualitatively
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsuccessful purchase, I am disappointed.

Before that, I drove 40,000 on NEXEN tires, I decided to change it before going to the sea. So literally jumped from one rubber to another. At plus 40 degrees outside the window, intensive braking begins to simply slide like on ice on dry asphalt. It got scary. Consumption of liters * 100 / km on full tanks on the highway turned out to be higher than that of NEXEN by half a liter. Yes, and it shakes on asyfalte stronger than on the predecessor. I drove somehow on wet grass, it doesn’t catch at…

Pros
  • Price, Holds puddles and wet roads well. Doesn't wear out much.
Cons
  • 1) Poor road holding at high temperatures 2) Poor road holding at low temperatures 3) Rigid 4) High fuel consumption 5) Not at all for a country road.

The price for this rubber was moderate, worth the money, with careful driving for 5 years it’s definitely enough (we have a summer season from mid-May to October). The only negative is that it seems to have been discontinued, so in which case a replacement (especially in Eastern Siberia, where there is a lot of Chinese rubber) is difficult, if not impossible, to find.

Pros
  • The noise is the same as that of the rest of the rubber, the handling in the city and on the highway is good, I did not check hydroplaning - I slow down before puddles.
Cons
  • The sidewall is quite soft, like most summer tires. The day before yesterday there was a case of its breakdown at a speed of 100 km / h, but as it turned out during the repair, it caught a piece of reinforcement. Vulcanization helped, even the camera did not have to be installed. I don’t see any more specific shortcomings, I don’t see the point in testing through mud and ice. P / S After a couple of years, the vulcanization grunted, melted again, it was enough for a season, then it began to be lowered. Spat, bought a used cylinder. Today is already the 5th season, 2022, I put it on the car, it started shaking, one cylinder led. Stored vertically. I won’t take any more, though, the soft sidewall, I suffered with it.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disappointed with the purchase, useless products.

I will compare with Nokian Nordman sx tires. Dimension 225/45/r17, Kia ceed car of the 1st generation. Nokian was used on the front axle, Goodrich on the rear. For 3 seasons, the Goodrich tires almost faded to zero, when the Nokian was still with indicator 3. While the Nokian was in front, it was quieter in the cabin. In that year rearranged Goodrich tires ahead. After I got into a deep hole, a hernia came out on the Nokian. Swapped the wheels, Goodrich forward, Nokian back. It got louder and…

Pros
  • -
Cons
  • Wear resistance, noisy, nervously behaves in a rut

Excellent tires. He struck with a difference of a week 2 wheels of Pirelli Cinturato. There was not much money, and Goodrich, a friend from the winter, took him, who was advised in the car market. For 2 seasons, I did not regret the decision even once. Recently struck the third Pirelli while putting the spare. I will not buy this Italian trash again. Goodrich is a great tire, no matter the price.

Pros
  • Good road holding, soft. Resistant to bad roads
Cons
  • Didn't find