Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens - Optimized for Canon EOS SLR Cameras Review

If you buy it to work on the long end (photo hunting), the optical quality leaves much to be desired, or not for that kind of money.

I use with a Canon 1100 IS II, when checking in the store, I shot it at 1/50 300 mm I shoot portraits, consider high power consumption a disadvantage, you have to pay for the convenience and speed of focusing!

I am satisfied with the lens, if you choose between it and the 70-200L F4, then definitely 70-300 but if the hands are strong and get used to it, then no problem.

If we talk about the merits, then let's compare the subject with fifty dollars 1.8 Both blur the background well. 50 is an excellent focal length, and 70-200 is even better. 1.8 is an excellent aperture, and 4-5.6 it is convenient for the subject to remove children from hiding and strangers in the same way, A3/0_7627a_b6ae4f50_ Ru/get/9324/11802596 Jpg A8/0_77722_850792da_ lightweight and works in the dark.

After the operation of this miracle, I began to stare at the L series 100-400, I really want to get everything right)))) walk, ride with him, I RECOMMEND TO EVERYONE, especially those who do not know if they need a telephoto, EF 70-300 Ru/users/mister-khripkov/album/447940/

Pros: I got what I expected: a simple, inexpensive, very fast and reliable, like a crowbar, telephoto. Cons below: It used to be the same, but without IS. I did not notice the benefits of turning on IS in any of the two modes at all. Well, okay, everything suits me even without stabilization

Has pros: Excellent image quality at non-maximum focus, the stub works excellently, is convenient, blurs the background fabulously. Its cons: does not focus well on a long focus (only on a high-contrast picture, and then not the first time, with pens :)

I chose to buy a lens . Because of the cost, I decided against purchasing any of the other options available on the market, and the L-series was the only one I selected. In general, I am delighted with this device more often than I am not pleased with it, but it still misses, there are flashes, it smears, there are inaccuracies and graininess, and I noticed this when I shot from a distance (L-ki). After purchasing a flash 580, the number of shots that were missed decreased. The difference in…

Has some pros Sharp already at f / 5.6 from 70mm to 200mm (which cannot be said about the second version of the lens, it is sharp only from 200 to 300) The stabilizer is excellent, but noisy. Its cons: The lenses inside dangle the front part rotates when focusing (you don’t use a polarizer)

Justifies its price by a factor of 150 percent. Worth the cost, especially when they went for between 18,000 and 20,000 dollars each. Now more than ever, you should be able to get a brand new one for 13,000. (pre-owned, making it even more affordable). In terms of the dimensions, it is important to point out that when it is set to the 300 mm setting, it becomes immodestly long. When it is extended, the girls will naturally and strangely squint because it has been a habit for them. The shop…

Has some pros Sharpness, stub, bokeh - excellent! Dimensions can also be attributed to the advantages, and at the same time a low price, with such quality. Cons: All the same, there is a backlash of the leaving part, it’s somehow uncomfortable . And at the same time there is an assumption - you need to protect it from dust

In order to take photographs of birds, I use it in conjunction with a Canon 50D. Even when the weather is gloomy, between 70 and 220, it provides a very clear picture with colors that are pleasing to the eye. I take most of my pictures with a focal length of 300 millimeters, and this one works "by mood." At other times, the lather is rather robust, and the picture is occasionally very clear, with an excellent depiction of the bird's feather (even in poor light!). When I use the 50D's rate of…

Sharpness and contrast are both present. It makes no sense to shoot with my copy at 300mm because somewhere between 220 and 300 parts are not added. It is almost like a fix at 70mm, but it becomes blurry between 200 and 300. (on 500D). The contrast is excellent in every way. Working on an open aperture at 70-220, which was an enjoyable and unexpected discovery (the aberrations are minimal). It is not necessary to stop the aperture in order to get a picture that is satisfactory. Producing to a…

Comments are superfluous, Canon keeps the brand, which cannot be said about other brothers from the East. Different pros: In general, I am satisfied with the lens. Takes clear pictures at both the minimum and maximum focal lengths. It is noticed that the pictures are clearer if you use a tripod, while turning off the stabilizer. Its cons: If you shoot somewhere in a quiet place, you can hear the motor buzzing, I would not say that this is ultrasound, as the manufacturer claims. Yes, it was…

I am satisfied with the lens, if you choose between it and the 70-200L F4, then definitely 70-300 is a stub and a larger zoom. Fast and nimble, gives a beautiful picture and nice bokeh. There is a possibility of a little blurring at 300, but if the hands are strong and get used to it, then no problem. Got pros: Nimble, stabilizer, good bokeh, quality, zoom, not noisy. Cons below: loud motor, aperture, to fully fold you need to switch to MF mode

If you buy it to work on the long end (photo hunting), it is better to save up for something more worthwhile. if for portraits and reportage, then it will do. In general, the optical quality leaves much to be desired, or not for that kind of money. Pros below: Solid appearance, convenient operation. Good colors and bokeh. Stabilizer. Has cons: Full soap and strong HA at 200-300 mm. on the open. Closing the aperture somewhat improves things, but not dramatically. Slow autofocus, especially at…

Comments are superfluous, Canon keeps the brand, which cannot be said about other brothers from the East. Pros below: In general, I am satisfied with the lens. Takes clear pictures at both the minimum and maximum focal lengths. It is noticed that the pictures are clearer if you use a tripod, while turning off the stabilizer. Different cons: If you shoot somewhere in a quiet place, you can hear the motor buzzing, I would not say that this is ultrasound, as the manufacturer claims. Yes, it was…

The disadvantages can be considered insignificant - they do not affect the quality of the shooting. The benefits far outweigh. I don’t consider the noisy operation of the stabilizer a disadvantage, for example, I even like it when I hear it :-) With its pros. Stabilizer: allows you to shoot handheld even at relatively long shutter speeds (up to ~ half a second), has two modes of operation (stabilization along one axis and two). Cutting. Fast focus. Some cons: Backlash focus ring; Doesn't…

It creaks like styrofoam on glass. Different pros: The stabilizer is super tenacious, because of this, the camera decides that it is possible to take shutter speeds much longer than, for example, its analogue Canon 70-300. So, for example, under the same conditions, the Canon 70-300 tells the carcass (or how they communicate there) in the Av mode that you need to do a shutter speed of 1/60, then under the same conditions this Tamron tells you that you can do 1/10 and there will be no soap (the…

Sharpness and contrast. At 70mm it’s almost like a fix, at 200-300 it’s blurry, (corrected): it makes no sense to shoot with my copy at 300mm, because somewhere from 220 to 300 parts are not added (on 500D). The contrast is top notch. Working on an open aperture at 70-220, which was a pleasant surprise (the aberrations are minimal). There is no need to stop the aperture to get an acceptable picture. Manufacturing quality. I have not dealt with L-s, but this lens does not look cheap like a kit…