Pros
- High-quality embly, convenient focal lengths, lens hood and case included
Cons
- Like all zooms dust into the camera, plastic mount
Pros
- For trips, you can shoot macro.
Cons
- I see only one - this is a plastic bayonet mount, which, although it holds up well, metal is metal!
Pros
- With cropped cameras, it will have an EGF equal to 27-157,5 The stabilizer works for another 2 if suddenly you decide to take another shot after the first one, then the stabilizer will not have to turn on again.
Cons
- Since there are a large number of lenses in the lens, it works like a vacuum cleaner, just hold the lens in your hands and turn the zoom ring - the rear lens will move back and forth substantially, sucking in and pushing air out.
Pros
- Pretty sharp (for a price of 9 pieces) dignity, but nice) In the dark, it' it noticeably does 18-55 At 18 and at 105 focal lengths, it really is", a little tint and beauty.
Cons
- at least it doesn’ but for me it’ After the whale 18-55, the differences are not big, deep. " I think this is the main and, in fact, the only drawback, you can close your eyes to the rest (I will explain in the comments) Oh, yes, I didn’ at 18-55, the stub simply bites into space.
Pros
- Looks solid on budget carcasses.
Cons
- There are only two drawbacks, but used it for about two months and did not notice the accumulation of dust on the glass.
Pros
- Good portrait
Cons
- bad landscape painter
Pros
- 1) Convenient focal lengths - you can shoot the expanses of our nature, and it’s good to zoom in on the main subject 2) Good design - everything is well assembled, nothing creaks or dangles, the rings go softly, the trunk does not climb out) 3) Stabilizer - you can take clear photos at fairly slow shutter speeds - if you do not suffer from excessive shaking, of course) 4) Good equipment - case and lens hood included 5) Relatively small size, especially in comparison with the analogue from Canon 6) See for yourself at 100% magnification, for this I advise you to use a high-quality photo viewer, Ru/users/slnbad/view/788180/? page=0 7) Just ease of use - the lens is convenient and pleasant to use, there is a convenient ring for focusing, there is no risk of pulling out the tube by the roots like at 18-55, for example :) 8) Unlike 18-55, you can get at least some picture page=0
Cons
- Well, where without them ( 1) Autofocus is not always fast and accurate 2) The lens is dark, however, it’s stupid to demand more from the whale, the same 18-55 is darker, and noticeably 3) The mount is plastic, which is not a disadvantage if used carefully
Pros
- -Nikon's "Whales" line includes one of the greatest models. - Variations in the focal length (18-105mm) -The quality surpasses that of 18-55. - The inclusion of a stabilizing agent - Low in both weight and volume (compared to analogues) The price is reasonable, but occasionally for as little as one penny you can locate a loophole in the system. - Capable of focusing at a rapid pace - Reasonably silent motor This lens, with its AF-S designation, is a godsend for screwdriver-free bodies. The ability to show off is probably the greatest benefit of this lens; by twisting the lens hood, you can play the role of a "uncle of a cool photographer."
Cons
- Soap, additional soap, and still more soap.
Pros
- Cheap in CHINA, Accurate Autofocus with Stabilizer, Wide Range of Focal Lengths
Cons
- you start to take notice as you gain more experience and practice working with different lenses, but for those who have only acquired, I would not write this.
Pros
- Quality. Nice photo. Usefulness (useful) (useful). User friendliness.
Cons
- And yet we use the term "vacuum cleaner." Price in red, 8-9
Pros
- Compatible with the vast majority of shooting conditions that may be found in the city.
Cons
- The plastic mount is an immoral form of oppression.
Pros
- It has a good amount of crispness and is likely neither better nor worse than analogs. Its behavior in the corners is occasionally better than the 18-55's, which is a case for choosing it as the primary lens rather than the more common 18-55. The thread on the filters is somewhat wider than necessary; you can wound it anyway you like (for 18mm, a simple protective UV and polarizer does not create vignetting - the frame is wide). A typical plastic petal hood with its own (unthreaded) mount and a purse are both included. You can freely rotate the ring when the autofocus is on. A little sky appeared when I photographed a clearing practically vertically from my feet to the horizon; the 105mm lens also obviously zooms in and blurs, so you should only use it for lengthy trips. 18mm is wide enough for a beginner to not consider more breadth. Who cares? It seems strong and convincing. It is pleasant to the touch and operates gently, producing essentially no more noise than the motor's main component, which had to be audible from the street outside. For instance, taking close-up shots of springtime flowers and buds at 105 millimeters and f5.6 produces an extremely odd background blur. Moreover, in one shot, it appears as though a blurry area wraps around sharp edges as if through a watery eye. Although it is not explicitly stated, this is unusual in the field of optics. I'll let you in on one more little secret: go out to the embankment at night and take a photo of the ever-present Kremlin at f22 aperture from a tripod or place your briefcase on a stone (you'll smear it with your hands anyway). All the lights will transform into stars with rays; those who have a smaller limit of f16 stars will have obvious and, most importantly, natural stars. A 105mm lens can generally be used with an aperture as large as f36.
Cons
- It is appropriate to think about the expense first and foremost. drastically different from the years 18 to 55. In my opinion, the pricing shouldn't be the standard $12,000, but rather should be in the range of 8,000 and 10,000. F5 is currently set to 50 mm. The prefix "ED" is nothing more than marketing jargon; do not pay attention to the fact that the color is, in theory, the same as that of the younger brothers of digital compacts. For example, I used the Nikon 24-85mm f/2.8-4D IF AF lens, which excels in color reproduction even when it does not have the ED prefix, but it did not turn out to be a very strong performer in terms of sharpness. As far as I can tell, they installed a low-dispersion ED glass piece in this specific case just for the inscription. It is impossible to describe this lens as cool because of the amount of distortion present in the corners. The stabilizer does its function, however when I initially switched it on, I was unable to distinguish between ON and OFF. 18-55 is not one of the better stubs I've seen. If at all possible, turn it off and only turn it back on when absolutely necessary. This is another reason to lower sharpness in sunny weather. When it is cloudy outside is one situation where this might apply. Professional professionals rarely wear lenses with stubs, and when they do, they rarely give the stub's placement on the lens' body any thought.
Pros
- 1. A crisp image when shot at a distance. 2. Excellent stability even when shooting at wide angles. 3. A focusing speed that is both quick and quiet 4. Accurate autofocus when shooting at telephoto. 5. Reasonably inexpensive pricing.
Cons
- 1. Less sharp when viewed from a wide angle. 2. The stabilizer will work on multi-pixel matrices, but it will leave a very slight blur or doubling at shutter speeds that are faster than 1/250 when it is in the teleposition. 3. If you look very closely, you'll see that the corners of the frame are notably less sharp than the ones in the middle. 4. When attempting to focus on the horizon with a wide-angle lens, the autofocus feature will occasionally give preference to objects that are closer, and there is no way to quickly set the focus to infinity manually.
Pros
- Well located focal point, very well put together. Stab. Very adaptable in every conceivable manner.
Cons
- Dark (but this is not a negative) (although this is not a drawback). It will suddenly begin to lather for no apparent reason at times.
Pros
- -good image quality and superb sharpness throughout the whole range of focal lengths (see comment); -a range of focal lengths that is good and meets the majority of users' needs - the quality of the craftsmanship is quite high, in spite of the plastic mount - I was impressed by the zoom mechanism - everything operates without jerks or backlash - - rapid and confident focusing, good performance from the stabilizer - the ability to bring the focus manually when auto focus is erroneous; it makes mistakes infrequently, but try shooting a black cat in a dark room:) - Not only does the lens's substantial size contribute to the camera's robustness, but it also makes operating the device more convenient.
Cons
- It would appear that lenses of varying qualities are available, which is the likely cause of the abundance of polar evaluations.
