Pros
- Photo quality, user-friendly interface, speed and quality of image processing, easy enough to use for beginner photographers, there are a lot of bells and whistles.
Cons
- Until I saw
Pros
- weight, comfortable, rubberized, unlike kenon d1100, good kit, low price for a DSLR, matrix with cleaning function, unlike kenon, stamps 3 frames per second
Cons
- Most killed by the lack of functions that depend on the current firmware! not from the hardware! for example, where is exposure bracketing (a series of shots with different exposures), why didn’t they add HDR photos like on 5100? if you want to make hdr there is no such function as breaking! After all, it's a trifle for the manufacturer to make a similar firmware as on the older model! The backlash of the memory card cover is not critical, of course, but it infuriates a little the screen is kind of soapy! You won’t understand a clear picture or a soapy one from it, it’s also inconvenient to process photos directly on the camera optics are more expensive than canon
Pros
- Excellent matrix, good quality assembly, excellent pictures, easy and simple menu, info button. A very necessary little thing, Super high-quality video.
Cons
- Display only
Pros
- Very fast autofocus, even in the evening without backlight, the lamp focuses pretty quickly. Excellent color reproduction, plus very wide color scheme settings. It is comfortable in the hand, I got used to the control buttons quickly, they are located under both hands. There is a programmable fn button. ISO 1600 is fully operational. The video is of good quality, and if you set the focus mode to tracking during video shooting, then it focuses on objects itself, the only drawback is that the noise of the focus motor will also be recorded on video. The battery holds an average of 500 or more frames, I was able to shoot and 650-700 (without a flash) is very good. It is possible to process photos on the camera itself, both raw and jpg files, believe me, it is very convenient, especially when there is no computer at hand. And most importantly, the price!
Cons
- Disadvantages can be found in everything, but in this camera they are not significant and do not affect the quality of the photo.
Pros
- 1. Ease of management. This is a priority for people who take something more complicated than a mobile phone or a regular digital camera for the first time. The menu is very detailed and intuitive at the same time. Of course, sometimes I would like to change / correct something faster, but even with one programmable button, it is very convenient. Lots of nice little things. For example, if you took 2 frames from the same position in different modes, then on the display you can zoom in on the picture and use the wheel to compare the same parts of the frame, revealing the best one. Very nice. 2. Price. Not very expensive. Let's say the same Canon 500D will be more expensive, but in terms of characteristics they are on a par with this device. Of course, do not forget the lack of a "screwdriver" and for convenience, you will need to take AF-S lenses so that the device focuses itself. And a similar lens (for example, a 50mm fix) canon will cost an order of magnitude cheaper. But this is already a matter of taste in relation to lenses. Maybe the manual is important for someone. 3. Opportunities. Of course, for such a price (I took 18-55mm with a whale) for 21900. The camera has a lot of possibilities. Fine tuning of all parameters. Very wide sensitivity range. Good photos at high ISO values. Those. if you want to take a picture of a person in a nightclub, then at ISO 3200 it will work out well. Of course, not for printing on A4 format, but in order to share with friends and throw "FBontakte", here you will be happy. Here you can attribute good shutter speed values. With excellent lighting at a minimum shutter speed, you can catch a lot. 4. Video. Unlike all the same 500d, the video works much better here. I don’t use 1080p . 720 at 30fps is enough. And of course tracking autofocus. It will be interesting and easy to shoot. Live view can be attributed here, although you rarely use it. But the screen is clear and informative.
Cons
- 1. Of course, the microphone could also be made stereo, but for the inexperienced (like most) it will do. 2. Shooting speed 3 frames / sec. For its price (small) it will do, but sometimes you want to go faster. But this again rests on older models. 3. If you want to use motor lenses, you will have to spend a little more.
Pros
- Little noise at high ISO. Fast focus. Great video.
Cons
- The cover of the flash card creaks every time you touch the camera. Why is she so big?
Pros
- Rugged body, comfortable grip (I have a small hand), convenient control, in-camera raw processing, auto-correction of lens distortions and XA, a very clear interface, standard connectors (usb, hdmi, av out), compact charging, CMOS-matrix with the function cleaning, 14MP (no frills), fast and low-noise focus, design, noble, no rattling shutter lag, clear menu prompts
Cons
- after all, the cover of the memory card compartment is a little loose - but this is already nit-picking
Pros
- cheap, not a pity to kill
Cons
- The inscriptions from the buttons are erased, dirty colors, there is no input for an external microphone, fullHD is only 24 fps, which means it is not there. Slow for reportage shooting. The Auto, Guide modes are completely unusable and only confuse the beginner.
Pros
- APS-C matrix. The stabilizer of the supplied lens is good, I was able to shoot a clear shot with a shutter speed of 1/2 s and a focal length of 55 mm (of course, you need to hold the camera well). The ability to shoot in RAW + JPEG is convenient (however, RAW is only compressed here - I can’t say if this is more of a disadvantage or advantage). However, competitors in the RAW price category also have it.
Cons
- Grossly mistaken with the white balance in the "Landscape" (LS) Picture Control mode: if the frame is mostly water and sky, or if the shutter speed (exposure) is somewhat shorter than required by the level of illumination and sensitivity, the frame will be all "red". Moreover, it practically does not depend on which white balance preset is selected (if you set it correctly: on a sunny day - "Auto" or "Direct sunlight") - manual white setting + then a photo editor can relatively help out! With the "Standard" (SD) Picture Control, errors are not as noticeable. Sometimes it slightly overestimates the brightness (overexposure). Moreover, the brightness is overestimated with auto _no_flash! With a flash, oddly enough, it turns out more correctly. I was not the first to notice both, I read in the reviews, and I confirm. As a result, the sky is sometimes white, so even from RAW (it is compressed here) it is difficult to pull out something sensible, you need to check the view immediately when shooting and adjust the exposure, ISO, aperture (see also the comment below). At first it even seemed that even in manual (M) mode it was impossible to turn off the flash completely! And the instruction is silent that to turn off the flash, you can simply close its cover! And _through_menu_ in exposure priority, aperture priority, program auto (P) and in "manual" the flash is adjusted, but not turned off. It would be nice if they did such a shutdown for all modes by hand and would write it in the instructions. But it can be turned off through the menu in some modes. This ambiguity is confusing. In addition, there are "auto without flash" and "landscape" modes, where it is always off. There is no simple setting of the shutter speed to "infinity" from the menu, instead you can use the "M" mode of the A / M switch on the lens: manually rotate the lens, guided by the sharpness in the viewfinder (it is electronic) or on the display. You just can’t wind it up to the end: it won’t be infinity, but who knows what, unsharply, that is, it spins further than necessary.
