📷 Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Canon DSLR Lens (6 Year Limited USA Warranty) Review

The HOYA MC UV(0) filter is the cheapest. Perhaps without it, paragraphs 1, 2, 3 of the shortcomings will be irrelevant. A very decent lens. Bokeh, of all that I had, the most gorgeous. I bought it a month ago, since then I have hardly taken pictures from the camera.

before that there was a previous version of this lens - there were problems with autofocus, but in the service center they replaced it without any problems. Its pros: at 1/10 warranty for its products - few people can boast of this (if you take a certified one in the 2022, the guarantee does not apply to the Chinese market). Cons: there are almost no shortcomings - if you find fault, it is quite massive, and you need a large filter (82mm)

Got pros: Aperture + stub = even on an open aperture, to Nikkor 24-120/4 VR) Sharpness starting at 2.8, Has some cons: Rather nit-picking (requires verification). 1 hares in the backlight from multipoint bright sources (lanterns in the center of Hong Kong). 2 - creates a shadow. 3 on almost all focal lengths. 4 D750).

I bought the first nikkor 24-70 with an official guarantee, cost 66,500 the guarantee was not immediately checked on the tampon website, but after contacting by e-mail, the guarantee of 5 shooting on canon

Before that, I used the Nikkor 24-70 2.8 top reportage lens for many years, was satisfied, I bought this Tamron, Fast autofocus, cool stabilizer,

Out of habit, I almost dropped the camera when I was shooting from a tripod, snapping off the mount, it almost fell out of my hands under its weight, I got used to walking with fixes, and now, together with the d750 carc, it weighs almost 2 kg, but it’s nice that such colossus in your hands, it's like a Ford Mustang - relatively inexpensive, but very brutal))) in short, I' and just admired the result.

One of the most affordable options is the HOYA MC UV(0) filter. Maybe if that's not there, the other problems listed in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 won't matter. A superb optic, indeed. The Bokeh in my camera was the most beautiful thing I possessed. Since I only got this camera a month ago, I haven't used it much. Has some redeeming qualities You can get some great shots at night with a combination of a wide aperture and a short stub. Bright stars can be seen with an open aperture and a portable…

Before you buy a lens, look better and check it. Even brand new under warranty. Has some pros Good sharpness in the range of fr 24-50. And at fr 50-70 it doesn’t bring the focus to 2 cm, which affects the sharpness that you lose. The lens is working at 50%. I really liked the focusing speed, the stabilizer works well. Shot with a shutter speed of 1/20 everything is fine. Got cons: There was only one drawback. Focal length 50-70 does not bring the focus to 2cm to the subject. This made me very…

I specifically sold the Tamron 24-70 of the first generation (which is A007), as it sucked dust. The sharpness of the new one (A032) is noticeably higher, not according to MTF, but according to live photos with hair, leaves, and so on. Vignetting is significantly better (in the sense that it is smaller) at the wide end and full hole. The monolithic body with seals inspires confidence in use and the fear of gouging it by accident disappears. I recommend it as the main regular zoom. If you have…

Before that, I used the Nikkor 24-70 2.8 top reportage lens for many years, was satisfied, but left it to my wife during the divorce. After some time, I bought this Tamron, because I heard a lot of good things about it in reviews on Youtube. Not disappointed! Fast autofocus, cool stabilizer, sharp picture. It seems to me that he is better than the old Nikon. Good lens. He was also lucky to buy a new one for 70,000

The lens is great for solving most tasks at a high professional level, which is unlikely to be inferior to analogues of native lenses from Nikon and Canon in terms of results, at a price half as low. Here you can see the source of test photos taken with this lens: https://yadi. Sk/d/v5a6sHMh3MFPvL Or a photo in jpeg format on Photos: https://fotki. . Ru/users/avikdoc/album/570769/

Very big questions for your service guys. In a world where sales of cameras and optics are falling more and more and competition is getting tougher, you clearly need to rethink your relationship with the client. I contacted you online several times and in response, just silence Making changes to the review after a few more months of use. I can say for sure that it is much better than the Nikon 24-70 F 2,8 of both versions. And also better Canon 24-70 F2.8L and Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM There was an…

Everything written below is only my experience, I do not pretend to be true! Charter from used 24-70 of the first version, which I started to play after 200,000 runs (and there were 4 different years of production), they always washed some corner and in general, I bought this tamron with the thought: well, I’ll kill a year and sell it with a mileage of 300,000 - but on a guarantee, I will lose 20 thousand in total. And stayed with him. He photographed in the "one day in kindergarten" format…

I bought the first nikkor 24-70 instead of the one who died at work. White, with an official guarantee, cost 66,500. Moreover, the guarantee was not immediately checked on the tampon website, but after contacting by e-mail, the guarantee of 5 years was confirmed. The advantages and disadvantages are higher, in general I consider it a very good tool for my money. The only thing that does not leave the feeling that now I'm shooting on canon

If you have enough money for native optics, take your own, the color rendition will be much better. If not enough for 24-70, consider fixes. In general, lately I have been shooting exclusively on fixes because of their weight and image quality, for example, Nikkor 35mm, 24mm, fifty dollars 1.4G, this is what you should strive for on a limited budget. Better a few good light fixes. than one such zoom! I sincerely wish that your pictures only please you!