Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Kuakowska ᠌ photo
1 Level
153 Review
0 Karma

Review on Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits by Ada Kuakowska ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

Purchased my very first DSLR camera. We went with Sony since we needed him to be able to shoot high-quality images and movies. We considered both the Sony A65 and the Sony A58 because, according to the reviews, there is not a significant quality gap between the two. The Sony a65 has a viewfinder and produces high-quality videos. Yet we reasoned that taking the A58 would be the most cost-effective option. When we compared the two cameras in the store, we discovered that the viewfinder of the a65 is fundamentally superior; the world appears to be more vibrant and engaging when viewed through it. In addition, the manufacturer improved the LCD monitor on the a65, so the shot that is captured looks very vivid and luminous. Because the portrait photo turned out to be more fascinating approximately at a distance of 70-85, which did not allow the 1855 lens to be achieved, the end consequence was that we purchased an A65 with a whale 18135 lens. They "flew" a little with a flash card, got a Sony SD, and while the read speed is excellent at 40 mb/s, the write speed is just 10 mb/s. The recording speed is definitely not sufficient while shooting in RAW or JPEG + RAW, and the camera slows down as a result. It would appear that you require a memory card that has a write speed of 40 megabytes per second. On the monitor of the camera, the picture appears to be in superior quality, but when viewed on a standard computer monitor, you can notice that the pictures are not identical. There are some that lack brightness, while others lack saturation, warmth, and so forth. As a consequence of this, completing the photo in Lightroom turned out to be an absolute requirement. Really happy with the purchase, and the photo and video quality is excellent and vibrant.

Pros
  • + The perfect camera for those who are just starting out + Quick autofocus + Live shots (subjectively: a touch sterile without alteration, plus it's excellent to add a little saturation) + Strong structure and Great video on top of a high rate of fire
Cons
  • -There are not enough buttons for quick access to the camera's functions -There is not enough aperture when shooting indoors with a whale 18 135, the photo is not so detailed and bright -Autofocus occasionally misses in a dark room -With the built-in flash, the photo is somehow overexposed, especially when shooting in close -The lens collects dust like a vacuum cleaner + The disadvantages are not significant; I believe that for other cameras, they are about the same.

Comments (1)

Please, sign in to write a comment
July 14, 2023
I used it for a year and a half, used it in a variety of conditions, there were mainly two lenses: 18-135 (3.5-5.6) and 16-50 (2.8). Never failed.