Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
sony slt-a65v 24.3 mp translucent mirror digital slr camera 18-55mm lens: review, features, and benefits logo

Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits Review



Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
📷 Digital Cameras, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM


img 1 attached to Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits
img 2 attached to Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits
img 3 attached to Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits
img 4 attached to Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits


Model NameSony SLTA65V
Form FactorCompact SLR
Skill LevelAmateur, Professional

Description of Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits

Product Characteristics

The Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR With 18-55mm Lens is a second-generation camera featuring advanced Translucent Mirror Technology. With its 24.3-megapixel sensor, this camera captures stunningly detailed images and allows for amazing enlargements. It combines the convenience and versatility of a digital SLR with the innovative translucent mirror design, making it a powerful tool for photographers of all levels.

Similar Products in the Market

In the world of digital cameras, the Sony SLT-A65V stands out due to its unique features. However, there are ...


Global ratings 43
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

Type of review

The camera is 3 years old. Completely satisfied. Pretty easy to set up. If you shoot professionally, then everything is just wonderful shots. Macro shots are good too. Pros: -Photo quality is great - Crop helped a lot when shooting landscape - It is possible to take good pictures without processing Has cons: - Does not work well in the cold, however, this is typical for all cameras

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item was good, I'll recommend it to my friends.

Pros: - Fast (good autofocus) - Fairly compact - Good picture quality - Fairly cheap optics - Long battery life Has some cons: - Minolt shoe, you need an adapter for almost everything - Low working ISO - In poor lighting with Live View Parameters disabled, the screen may slow down

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

The camera came across a Japanese carc, and Japanese optics. Some pros: 1)24mp 2) High-quality viewfinder 3) 10k per second 4) Folding display with two degrees of freedom and very high quality color reproduction. 5) Although plastic but high-quality case :) 6) Logical and convenient controls. 7) It comes in a very good kit, both wires and software and everything is very complementary to the image. 8)GPS 9) Rarely misses exposure :) Some cons: 1) A standard kit lens lathers around the…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

Photo: Shutter video at 10fps: ? v=NKt2ufY8hoU I have been using it for more than half a year. an excellent camera if you study it. Whale 18-55 is quite normal, but not worth its almost 7000, the trunk plays,comllects dust, it rotates when focusing, thereby knocking down the polarizing filter. I determined the sharpness to be normal at 18mm, this is f / 5,6-8 and at 55 it’s already where then of order f/13 I shoot mostly in A and M modes. The machine gun is also good, but it strives to…

  • Price, 24mp, 10fps, HDR, high-quality swivel screen, fullhd 50fps, EVI (for some, this is a drawback), a magnifying glass for focusing . I can’t remember everything :)
  • Shoe sony, at ISO 100 noise, no adjustment of frames per second, since it is not always necessary exactly 10 . the screen could have a greater degree of freedom. iso 25600 is only available with multi-frame noise reduction, but it is still useless as the picture will still be terrible. A translucent mirror collects dust and dirt (that's not the point), it's scary to clean it because it's very soft, I'll suddenly pierce it >_< SteadyShot seems to work only on video. Connected to a PC via USB drains the battery very quickly.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

I took the cheapest fix 50 \ 1.8 the picture is better, but often the focus is not so hot, I found out that the ideal sharpness is at f4.0 I suffered for a long time with a non-ideal focus at a wide aperture, until I guessed to lower the resolution of the image to 12m - a miracle happened))) the lens became sharp at an open aperture, at 2.2 it is perfect! The pictures look like professional photos! Example: ? page=0 Perhaps the sharpness is even more ideal, but for portrait shooting it has…

  • Good pictures with the right camera setup. Kit 18-55 is not bad with a flash, without a flash it is much worse - just right for video .
  • If you are not lazy and figure it out, then everything is fine, the only thing is that your eyes can get tired of a non-optical viewfinder.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

Great video with very fast autofocus, the number of megapixels matters, here's an example: ? page=2 And although it is written that the capacity of the battery. for 500 photos, but apparently this is when everything is with a flash, because I did 1800 at a time and would have done more, but the card got clogged.

  • rate of fire, nothing really escapes, just a machine gun
  • 1. Aperture due to a translucent mirror is small, in the dark, sometimes it is simply not able to focus if the subject is dark. 2. For those who need to quickly change all the settings - not very good. convenient, there are not enough buttons to control all the parameters

I took it for my girls (wife and daughter, they are novice lovers). in the "auto" mode, there are hardly anycommpetitors. I am very pleased with the camera. Here are examples taken with this camera without processing: ? page=0 ? page=3 ? page=2 ? page=6

  • A powerful and intelligent algorithm of the camera processor, which allows you to forgive many mistakes for a novice photographer. Excellent tracking autofocus. Brilliant color shots, the widest range of settings, scene programs, creative styles and effects.
  • AEL - (exposure lock) works indistinctly, it is impossible to use the digital viewfinder / screen after shooting, when the entire buffer is full and the images are processed by the camera processor (continuous shooting, HDR stitching, long exposure photos, etc. ), lenses (and accessories ) is on average more expensive than competitors.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

This andcompetitors' devices seem to shoot similarly. More important, forcomparison, is the choice of lens. Who, in my opinion, should turn to this particular device. 1. Vision problems, but I want to shoot. Everything is clearly visible in the viewfinder, including the current setting information. And as you can see, it will. 2. Who cares about the video. Inferior to a decent video camera, only in stabilization. (preferably sober). Acomplete 2 in 1. In manual mode, you can get a clear video

  • already described in the comments.
  • Described. For a non-professional like me, they are not essential.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

for a long, long time I chose a camera to replace the a500. I did not want to change the awl for soap. But this camera is different. camera is great! pleasing to the eye everything . that it turns out - both photos and videos. . . complete with a whale 18-135 does its job at 5+))) bb, sharpness, autofocus at its best. . . in a room with external puff is also good. . . there are no critical flaws. . . took for 34800r. definitely worth the money. . .

  • ergonomics, comfortable grip, build quality (Thailand), evi, swivel screen, customizable buttons, capacious battery, kit 18-135, 24 mp, many art gadgets and direct access to them using customizable buttons, HDR and much much more, which is listed below
  • in my copy, the battery compartment cover is somehow not like that. either from other plastic, or marriage - different in color from the case (lighter), looks cheap, flimsy design. . . but not critical, of course.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend it.

To begin, I needed a new camera to replace my Canon 400D, so I decided to get this one. With the expectation that during this period of time, the matrices will have become less noisy and other attributes will have grown. I chose this camera since it was the only one in the bunch that featured GPS (given the nature of the activity, having GPS is important; however, GPS is only found in quite luxurious soap dishes and extremely pricey Nikona models). I don't consider Samsung as a technique). To…

  • GPS
  • obsolete model that, for some reason, has a 24 MP resolution and an extremely noisy matrix

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

Purchased my very first DSLR camera. We went with Sony since we needed him to be able to shoot high-quality images and movies. We considered both the Sony A65 and the Sony A58 because, according to the reviews, there is not a significant quality gap between the two. The Sony a65 has a viewfinder and produces high-quality videos. Yet we reasoned that taking the A58 would be the most cost-effective option. When we compared the two cameras in the store, we discovered that the viewfinder of the a65

  • + The perfect camera for those who are just starting out + Quick autofocus + Live shots (subjectively: a touch sterile without alteration, plus it's excellent to add a little saturation) + Strong structure and Great video on top of a high rate of fire
  • -There are not enough buttons for quick access to the camera's functions -There is not enough aperture when shooting indoors with a whale 18 135, the photo is not so detailed and bright -Autofocus occasionally misses in a dark room -With the built-in flash, the photo is somehow overexposed, especially when shooting in close -The lens collects dust like a vacuum cleaner + The disadvantages are not significant; I believe that for other cameras, they are about the same.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

Because of the several advantages that come with SLT technology, I made the decision to buy this camera, which will be my very first DSLR. These benefits include constant phase AF in video mode, increased rate of fire, simplification of the camera design due to the lack of slamming mirror mechanics (in theory, longer service life), electronic viewfinder (EVI) (although for some people this is a disadvantage), and the fact that the speed of using VI and LiveView is the same. In addition, these…

  • - Matrix 24 megapixels: superb picture even on whale glass; even scaling to the same size as a sensor with 16 megapixels, the advantages of a sensor with 24 megapixels are obvious to the naked eye. Matrix 24 megapixels: superb picture even on whale glass. The same rate of shooting whether the subject is being framed in the viewfinder or in LiveView. - An Optical Light Emitting Diode (OLED) Viewfinder of Exceptional Quality The presence of a "screwdriver" drive (at the moment, in the entirety of the SLT range! ), which indicates the capability to fully use the lenses that have been compatible with the Minolta AF system since 1985. - An incredible fire rate of up to 10 frames per second. Wonderful bonus! - A collapsible display with two degrees of freedom, very high quality color reproduction, and the ability to fold up. - SteadyShot Stabilizer for your camera. Ideal for taking photographs and films while having your arms outstretched, as well as for taking close-up views. For example, from the audience during a performance, the ability to quickly and easily enhance photographs through the utilization of DRO and Auto HDR options is really useful. - The Handheld Twilight Scene Mode enables you to take high-quality photographs of stationary subjects in the evening and at night, even when you are not using a tripod and even when the ISO is set to a higher value. This is made possible by the fact that the Handheld Twilight Scene Mode can be used with the camera held in one hand (6400). - Intra-camera panorama function (normal and 3D) - Capable of recording films in Full HD AVCHD 2.0 with stereo sound that is at least as excellent as a mid-range camcorder - The Auto and Auto+ shooting modes produce outstanding results with only one click, making them ideal for people who are just starting out with their photography. If you have this camera, you do not need to be a professional photographer in order to take good pictures with it. - Electrical level - Concurrent saving in RAW and JPEG formats - Let there be a plastic cover, but it should be of very high quality and have a nice finish\s- The ability to fold up small and be relatively lightweight. Because it can be held easily even by those with _small_ hands, I believe that it is appropriate for use by women who have female gender.
  • - The Minolt flash shoe and the various other issues that are associated with it - Restrictions in the minimum shutter speed of 1/4000 and predefined ISO values in the manual due to marketing requirements. Substantial noise even at medium ISO, and the output at ISO 1600 without extra post-processing is frequently not suitable because to the significant amount of noise present at that setting. - There is a noticeable amount of noise even when the ISO is set to medium. You have to climb into the menu and switch back and forth between regular JPG and RAW; there is no AF adjustment; the tracking autofocus mode is very weak; in real conditions, it seems to be ineffective. Some of the functions do not work in shooting modes that save in RAW, RAW + JPEG. - Limited options for reassigning the purpose of the buttons; - Some features are inoperable whether shooting in RAW, RAW + JPEG, or both modes. - Inability to change the AF; - Poor quality of the whale glass as a result of the mode being set to video, which has a low true resolution ratio (being new, I already had contact problems - "camera error") - Exorbitant prices and a restricted choice of branded optics, especially in Ukraine - Sony accessories are rather pricy

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are pros and cons, think before buying.

I just purchased an A65. There is a sign that says "Made in Japan" (for me - so at best in one of the developing countries, and not in the queen of technology). Both of the copies I viewed had the focus on the back of the screen. At one particular angle, one whale glass is angled inward. In another, the glass coats the corners uniformly, but the carcass backfocuses a little more clearly than in the first example. He did take it. In the service, by the way, it is not feasible to hand over the…

  • 1. Filming a video for another individual. 2. For my own purposes, I wanted a camera that had a higher top speed and better ISO performance than the A350. 3. Viewfinder - yes, it's good. 4. There is a decoupling of EVI from the shooting parameters, which is helpful for those who work in studios. 5. Matrix. Thrives in the light, which is a characteristic of SLT. It has a high quality and the capacity to doodle quite a bit when held up to the light.
  • - the precision of the adjusting done in factories - inexpensive plastic - having a limited number of buttons, including one that cannot be used to turn off the device There is no indication of the degree of stabilization, and SD cards are quite slow. Memory sticks are significantly slower than CF, in addition to being more expensive. CF is not the case. - There is no synchro contact. - The price is excessive. The price range of 28-30 is excessive for this skill. The ideal number is 20,000.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

Nice camera. After using the Minolta D7D, this camera appears to be more of a plaything. Yet, the construction and materials used are of a high caliber. There are benefits as well as drawbacks associated with the high resolution of the matrix. On the one hand, you are able to obtain photographs with extremely high resolution and more creative leeway when cropping. But, this is only possible with high-quality optics and ideal shooting conditions. The camera is somewhat noisier than the older…

  • Matrix with a high resolution. Pictures of a very high quality. Great video. Great viewfinder. Functionality in a good form. Rapid fire rate in the gun.
  • Matrix with a high resolution. Autofocus might occasionally fail to lock on when the aperture was wide open. Few primary areas of attention. Inability to modify the autofocus setting for a particular lens.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

When it comes to taking photographs as well as videos, I believe that this camera is the most capable option available in its price range. I am completely content with the option that was selected! I solved the problem of the camera's lack of a noisy matrix by purchasing a fast lens, which allowed me to simply lower the camera's ISO. Other than that, the camera is very cool))) We have never once been sorry that we made that decision! Has pros: a lot. a sensor with a resolution of twenty-four…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

Before that, there was a Sony a330 camera, compared to it, the colors are a little worse on the a65, but you can take pictures at iso 800, 1600 and the picture will be good on the old device, there was no such possibility at all. The electronic videofinder is excellent in good light better than the optical one. In the dark you can see the noise and I do not have enough resolution of the viewfinder. It is very convenient to focus with peaking (when contrast transitions are highlighted in color)

  • you can shoot at ISO 800,1600 without losing special quality peaking with manual focus ergonomics battery lasts a long time
  • Until I found it, I just want to have autofocus adjustment.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

It is better to shoot in the program auto "P" mode. and it’s even better to have a second portrait lens, you can completely manual, for example, Helios 77M6 1.8-50, and you will be very pleased with the result - there is practically no noise, a clean picture. in normal shooting, the 18-135 3.5-5.6 lens works well. Its pros: fast autofocus, ISO up to 800 workers, 1600 only during the day Cons below: in auto mode, it tries to set ISO 1600, it is better to shoot in software auto "P" mode.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

I tested it on others and took 700 photos, plus I shot it on video (with a total length of 20 minutes) there was still 40% of the charge left. since I bought it with an 18-55 lens, I’ll be honest, it’s awfully small, I’m going to buy somewhere up to 200, and in general I’m very satisfied)))) IMHO ! Its pros: 1) well, what pleases 24Mr. 2) the battery lasts somewhere for 2-3 hours, but it doesn’t hurt 2. 3) the picture on the video is beautiful. 4) in the video Af automatic is good, but you…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

Filmed so far only on a kit 18-55. I took a set of 18-55 / 55-200 for 36 kilorubles - the only thing that was available in the city for reasonable money. Delivered by courier to friends. They have Canon 550D. They immediately tested at high ISO, general pictures and videos. Nowhere Sonya does not lose. When I chose it, I was frightened by tests on ISO above 800. In reality, I did not find ANY DIFFERENCE with the 550D, except that Sony has better colors on the whale in all modes, including…

  • 1. Comfortable in the hand lies (the most comfortable grip for my hand). 2. The quality of the photo is not inferior to the older amateur devices of Nikon and Canon (600 D, 5100). 3. In terms of color, for my perception, colors are much more natural, bright and warm compared to Canon and Nikon. 4. Video is ONE HEAD higher compared to Canon and Nikon of the same level. 5. Constant autofocus in video is VERY CONVENIENT. 6. Phase autofocus in LV. There is no difference (in terms of speed) to shoot through the viewfinder or to sight on the screen. 7. The speed of the camera as a whole is just crazy. 8. Panorama modes are very high quality.
  • 1. The electronic viewfinder is weak in the dark. 2. There is not enough full-fledged sound of the "CLICK" shutter. It's electronically controlled. 3. Interchangeable optics are more expensive than competitors. Haven't figured it out yet, maybe in time.