Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Sirirat Benjakalyani ᠌ photo
Bangkok
1 Level
124 Review
112 Karma

Review on Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits by Sirirat Benjakalyani ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are pros and cons, think before buying.

I just purchased an A65. There is a sign that says "Made in Japan" (for me - so at best in one of the developing countries, and not in the queen of technology). Both of the copies I viewed had the focus on the back of the screen. At one particular angle, one whale glass is angled inward. In another, the glass coats the corners uniformly, but the carcass backfocuses a little more clearly than in the first example. He did take it. In the service, by the way, it is not feasible to hand over the item on the day that the purchase was made. In addition, the terms outlined in the Copy for changing the soneks are not very promising. Normally, making a purchase causes a surge of endorphins in the body, but for me, all that's happening here is irritation and a sense that I've been tricked. The quality of the products manufactured by the A65 is significantly lower than that of the A350. In comparison to the Sony 18-70mm F3.5-5.6, the 18-55 SAM lens is complete and utter garbage. This is the reason why 18-70 was taken off the market: it was causing a disruption in the market for more expensive staffers like babyseuse. I've already started to wonder: is it possible for me to return the A65, but then sell the whole system and switch to the canon? There are Minolta spectacles available for purchase; please write. Absolutely, you should avoid Sony if you decide to get a mirror system for yourself. The quality is well below standard; practically all of the cameras need to have their settings adjusted by the service. The assembly does not have any bearing on the product's quality; whether it Japan or Thailand, everyone makes mistakes. Do not be under the impression that things have improved with the A77; you will still experience the same difficulties. There is a focus adjustment for lenses available on the A77, albeit using it is not always helpful. Three years ago, the quality was far higher. -\sate. The camera started to win over users once certain adjustments were made and 1.05 firmware was made available. Because I just work with the focal point, there are essentially none of the usual issues with focus. Even with a low-end whale, it's still enjoyable to shoot videos. Latest version 1.06 adds the ability to disable the video button and makes it so the camera switches off even more quickly.

Pros
  • 1. Filming a video for another individual. 2. For my own purposes, I wanted a camera that had a higher top speed and better ISO performance than the A350. 3. Viewfinder - yes, it's good. 4. There is a decoupling of EVI from the shooting parameters, which is helpful for those who work in studios. 5. Matrix. Thrives in the light, which is a characteristic of SLT. It has a high quality and the capacity to doodle quite a bit when held up to the light.
Cons
  • - the precision of the adjusting done in factories - inexpensive plastic - having a limited number of buttons, including one that cannot be used to turn off the device There is no indication of the degree of stabilization, and SD cards are quite slow. Memory sticks are significantly slower than CF, in addition to being more expensive. CF is not the case. - There is no synchro contact. - The price is excessive. The price range of 28-30 is excessive for this skill. The ideal number is 20,000.