Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Janis Saikovskis ᠌ photo
1 Level
355 Review
0 Karma

Review on Camera Canon EOS 200D Kit EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 DC III, black by Janis Saikovskis ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

Today (beginning of 2022) the best choice from Canon's entry-level DSLRs. And in general, any, to be honest. It makes no sense to take fullframe DSLRs already, at the same price as R / RP. Cropped 800-850 are more expensive, but they can do the same; I don’t understand two-digit ones at all, who needs them - it’s expensive, it’s easier to take a full frame or an awesome 7D2 if you need a crop. 200 and 250D remain, and crazy four-digit series) The 250D was removed from the central contact in the shoe - immediately into the trash, by and large, only 200D remains from modern crop-reflex cameras for adequate money. Used for two years in parallel RP, 5D, old 650 and 450, as well as crop sleepers. As a result, I sold it, leaving myself the Sony 6500 as the main camera on the crop. Compared to it, the budget 200D has a much better screen, ergonomics and grip. But the 6500 is of course a completely different story . 200D is forever in my heart, so I decided to even write a review. Surprisingly balanced and pleasant camera, which almost did not infuriate (but everything usually infuriates me))

Pros
  • Size, ergonomics, grip, familiar and understandable form factor. Autofocus, especially in live view. This is practically a hybrid - DSLRs and mirrorless cameras with pluses from both worlds. Good non-soapy HD video with normal sound. Compared to the 250D, the hot shoe is not damaged. You can use cheap non-native batteries from aliexpress. They are suitable for RP. 18-55 stm lens is the best of all whales, macro, stable . but *
Cons
  • Management is spoiled compared to the ideal 450D-650D for me. Everything through Q type, like on cropped nikons :) The colors are slightly worse than on the old matrices. According to dd and noise, as there was a typical canon crop, it remained so. Nothing fundamentally improved. Only for a photo through the viewfinder, you can take a much cheaper used 600-650y calmly and it will be the same. *. but still not very sharp. It is better to use 18-135.