I took the camera in tandem with the FF for several tasks: - write video - copes perfectly well - try different exotic lenses for me, such as fisheye, macro, telephoto lenses - excellent - to have a small camera that you are not too lazy to carry with you - similarly. I compared in parallel images with FF on "fifty dollars" - on basic ISO when converting RAV, the difference comes down to the depth of field, and if the FF is clamped, then only to the aspect ratio. Yes, the basic color reproduction is different, but everything is quickly reduced to one result in a couple of slider movements. So there is no mythical color rendition of either Kenon or Olympus, unless of course you shoot only in jeeps. Moreover, I did not find magic FF on basic ISOs. Wouldn't recommend for action or portraits. I wrote about autofocus above, the working ISO does not allow you to work with short shutter speeds in case of lack of light. Good portrait lenses for micro are much more expensive than those giving a similar result for FF, compare the price of Olympus 75 / 1,8 and Kenon 135/2, while the recalculation of the lens will give 150mm / 3.5, which is not at all 135 / 2.0 on FF. I see this camera either as a photographer's notebook, or as a convenient and advanced traveler's camera. As the second to FF - excellent, both cameras complement each other, blocking the weaknesses. As the only one, itβs better to look at Fuji, naturally of the same 2022 release or newer
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera with Auto Focus-S Nikkor Zoom Lens (Discontinued by Manufacturer)
109 Review
Canon EOS 60D: 18MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body - Your Next Photography Companion
125 Review
Nikon COOLPIX L810 Digital Camera: 16.1MP, 26x Zoom, NIKKOR ED Glass Lens, 3-inch LCD (Blue)
95 Review
Discontinued Canon EOS 7D Digital SLR π· Camera Body Only with 18 MP CMOS Sensor
88 Review