Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Sharon Weaver photo
Greece, Athens
1 Level
480 Review
0 Karma

Review on 🚿 Ultimate Shower Experience with Pfister Bell Showerhead in Polished Chrome by Sharon Weaver

Revainrating 5 out of 5

BIG WATER SAVINGS AND COMPARISON TO NIAGARA EARTH MASSAGE 1.25 SHOWER HEAD

I bought this PFISTER Bell 1.5 GPM shower head along with the Niagara 1.25 GPM shower head. I thought these were pretty good water saving shower heads for the price. After testing both, I liked the PFISTER BELL SHOWERHEAD shower better. We have a rimless roll in shower and it takes a few minutes for the water to heat up to a comfortable temperature before we go in and unfortunately the water starts to flow an inch deep before we even go in. Devices still take the same amount of time to reach a comfortable water temperature, but the main difference is that water no longer has the ability to pool and gurgle nicely down the drain. Apparently we are finally saving water. The radius of both jets is small, but this PFISTER feels more solid and smooth through the middle, PFISTER BELL SHOWER HEAD 1.5 GPM: The Pfister Bell shower head seems to feel stronger. I don't particularly like the addition of extra air as it seems to cool the water and scorch it a bit. I'm giving 5 stars for significant water savings and a slightly stronger sense of water flow. NIAGARA EARTH MASSAGE 1.25GPMI gives this Niagara 1.25GPM 3 stars because it doesn't get enough water out of the shower head (our preference). But give 5 stars for the huge water savings. To be fair, the Pfister has 0.25 GPM more. We need to look at the durability of the two plastic showerheads. Either way, you'll save big on your water bills, and for the price of these shower heads, you can't go wrong.

Pros
  • Good thing
Cons
  • -