I bought the camera a couple of years ago, for a vacation, in order to take pictures of my family, the sea, landscapes, and most importantly! so that the quality of the pictures is better than on the phone. The choice fell on this camera with a 16-55 whale lens. I’m not talking about those characteristics, I’m not interested, it was only the quality of the picture that was interesting - which is not on this device! from the word in general. Full SOAP. There was an idea that something was wrong, maybe the settings or something else, I tried, read, looked, asked, gave to photographers - nothing changes with the quality of the picture - the soap is. The menu is very complex and incomprehensible, hard to get used to. What did you compare it to? c iPhone 11 c Canon 500D kit 16-55 which I bought 12 years ago but everything is ok in quality, I still take pictures sometimes. I tried to put other SIGMA 16 mm lenses - the same thing, but he ended up selling both more for video. I must say right away that I am not a professional photographer, I do not do reviews of equipment, I express my purely opinion about this product. With hands everything is in order, for an amateur, not one camera. Conclusion: the product is below average, the quality of the picture is very bad at 16-55 for sure! Or you pick up a lens of a higher class, but I don’t see the point in this. 10-12 year old Canon cameras shoot more interestingly. It is better to look towards other manufacturers or buy a good phone for the money, but not THIS.
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera Body (Kit Box) - No Lens Included, International Version with No Warranty
298 Review
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Nikon COOLPIX L810 Digital Camera: 16.1MP, 26x Zoom, NIKKOR ED Glass Lens, 3-inch LCD (Blue)
95 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review