The stub showed itself neutrally - I didn’t notice a super improvement, aperture 2.8 is also neutral - it only helps to blur the background, you still need to shine in the dark. Vacuuming, yes, the filter does not heal. Well, the quality does not affect, from personal experience. Yes, it works at 550, I bought it from my hands for 22k. Has pros: IQ! sharp, colorful. I tried 24-105, 17-50 tamron - they are incomparable, definitely, the first is less juicy, the second is less sharp. Let's compare my favorite tokina 11-16, but these are different distances Cons below: Still, focal lengths are not the most convenient. And shirik-neshirik, and a portrait-non-portrait. Is it just a reportage? 15-85 is more interesting, but the pixelmeter says it's not as sharp
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Fixed Lens - Discontinued by Manufacturer
93 Review
Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
124 Review
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review
📷 Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review