Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002 Review
78
·
Very good
Rating
4.5
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo
Media
(4)
Details
| Brand | Canon |
|---|---|
| Lens Type | Standard |
| Compatible Mountings | Canon EF |
| Camera Lens Description | 105 millimetres |
| Maximum Focal Length | 105 |
Description of Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
All-new optical design with significant improvements in peripheral brightness. High-performance standard zoom lens with constant f/4L aperture and a broad angle of view covering from wide angle to mid-telephoto. Air Sphere Coating (ASC) helps to significantly reduce flare and ghosting. Diagonal Angle of View:84°00' - 23° 20'. Image Stabilizer performance at up to 4 stops* of shake correction helps capture sharp images. Lens Construction: 17 elements in 12 groups. Circular Aperture (10 blades) helps deliver beautiful, soft backgrounds.
Pros
- The "red ring" and the letter "L" on the lens speak for itself, yet even so: 1) The lenses' build quality. even at f/4 is quite crisp, and f/8 to f/16 is often superb. 2) A wide focus length range. Although there is no "barrel" effect, the image looks good on Fullframe and rather broad on the near end on Crop. Three) Stabilizer. When filming video, it performs admirably and pulls even 1/5. 4) Aperture maintained at f/4 across the whole focal range. 5) An ultrasound motor. It focuses rapidly even on inexpensive versions, like the 600D, and works flawlessly with the 7D. a mostly metal body, but not entirely, a rubber gasket on the mount, a sizable focus ring, and huge overall proportions.
Cons
- Crop isn't particularly wide.
Pros
- Nice lens.
Cons
- That is all standard Canon behavior.
Pros
- To begin, its adaptability, as it can be used in a variety of contexts. Fast ultrasonic focus. Dust- and moisture-proof (I've removed them multiple times while it was lightly raining, and nothing has been affected). For such a zoom, the image has good clarity and color reproduction. The stabilizer is excellent in every way!
Cons
- There are not very many of them: The absence of a zoom ring lock at the initial position of 24mm (the lens falls out on its own weight, however the ring moves pretty elastically, but not tightly (as it should be)) Chromatic aberration that is quite strong when shooting full frame at 22MP resolution.
Pros
- stable under any circumstances. The pricing is appropriate just now.
Cons
- It captures hares with a more or less bright lighting. conventional drawings, such is the color representation
Pros
- Adaptability, pin-sharpness, and outstanding color reproduction are hallmarks of this lens.
Cons
- Chromatitis, on the other hand, can be brought down by software with just one click.
Pros
- The focal length range that is requested the most for a full matrix camera. A rather crisp image throughout the entire range of focal lengths The existence of a stabilizer, because one never knows who might require it and someone always does. The ability to focus quickly and precisely is maintained in practically any environment. Not a very substantial mass at all
Cons
- Although for a 4.0 hole and the output image, the price is not exactly adequate, it is not expensive enough to be considered excessive. The color reproduction is accurate, however the picture is not vibrant with color at all!
Pros
- excellent focal length considering the cost. I would even go so far as to claim that it is a fantastic universal lens for the price. the equivalent of the beginner level's workhorse in the intermediate level.
Cons
- Yes and no, in all seriousness no. The MB is burdensome, but there is a charge for the L.
Pros
- created with very good quality. a good zoom range. colorful "elech" shades. good clarity. Stabilizer.
Cons
- Chrome aberrations can occasionally be seen.
Pros
- swift, light, and precise. Failsafe. The stub actually has three steps (although there are already lenses with four and five steps). poured champagne and took a Neva bath. As though by clockwork.
Cons
- have, of course. What did you desire, though, evaluating properly (soap in the corners, the presence of XA, etc.)? Both Distagon 21/2.8 and 135L are not this. The lens functions as planned. Rating: 5, experience: about 5 years.
Pros
- L-ka. Not excessively pricey. a practical zoom range. Large, solid looking, and I love it. After then, a full frame update will be available.
Cons
- hoped for more. I didn't see a significant difference after the whale, which is 7 times less expensive (60D). Naturally, I didn't capture the exact same pictures, but I did compare the old and new ones on a level. Everything is not particularly sharp and black at medium and maximum focus lengths.
Pros
- The lens has become so popular that many people still aren't even aware that it exists after an entire line of Canon cameras with the capacity to capture video were released.
Cons
- Only one of the flaws prevents this lens from becoming a professional employee, and that is its aperture ratio.
Pros
- hues, degree of clarity at f4 aperture, focal lengths, and craftsmanship
Cons
- noisy stabilizer
