Tried. Adjusted. His month is Poyuzal. On either the long one or the short one, I didn't see any particularly pronounced soap or significant distortion. No, he isn't bad in my opinion. If you plan your shot and consider what you will shoot, hole 4 won't be an issue. Good, but not outstanding; still below the top ten. He, like a gorgeous woman, is not my type. She is blonde, and while everything seems to be going well for her, something is off. In the end, I chose to purchase a 24-70 L-II. This…

The first Elka in life comes after the first whales, the first glasses through the ring in 2022, the first 50mm 1.8, the first 35mm 2, the first 28mm 2.8, and so on. Unlike most other lenses, this one's glass never loses its sharpness, and the colors are spot on. Sharpness and color reproduction are also excellent on the Canon 700D, which he left in my care when he was carrying it. There are a total of 24 105 whales and other non-aperture glasses available for purchase or disposal. Because…

The red stripe L is given out unjustly, and in general, anything darker than 2.8 should not be given the L rating. Because I work in the technology industry, I believe that high-quality optics should be made of plastic (read more quickly). According to the "none" design, this lens does not roll on artistic pictures when used with any sauce. The one and only exception to this rule is when you are shooting in a studio and need to "so that everything is sharp." Well, travel.

The current price ofcomurse is inadequate; yet, the norms reflect the general increase in cost of living. His own good condition, recently acquired from a friend for $32,000. It's great for people who like to travel and take pictures, since I use it with my Canon 60D crop camera. Images I found the stabilizer to be effective, especially in challenging conditions. This is the best stubby choice there is for video. At first, I purchased one from the box office with the express intention of using…

If you are too lazy to bring alternative lenses with you (or buy them), this is generally extremely decent glass that can be used universally for everyday purposes. You are able to capture a decent image. By the way, I didn't mention anything about distortion in the picture or any of the other qualities, etc., etc. There is a significant amount of variance depending on the photographer and the carcass. One example would be that I've heard people say that this particular glass performs better on

This is Canon's cheapest and, in all honesty, least impressive zoom. The effective range of focal lengths is from 28mm to 95mm, albeit the extremes produce subpar results. Start drilling at a 4.5. Soaping is possible at 4 in very unnatural situations. If you want a universal zoom for only 25k, you don't need me to write about the drawing. I always get a fix when I'm shooting for art. The Canon EF 24-105 is a convenient travel lens. The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L

This lens has served me well for the past eight years. And he was unfazed by temperatures as low as -30 degrees Fahrenheit, as well as by heat, rain, and mud. You can't use a polarizing filter if you have a lens hood on it, and the aperture may be wider if you find fault with that. Marketers from Canon, however, remain steadfast in their position, insisting that customers pick between a stabilizer and an aperture. So, it's safe to say that this is the best all-around lens Canon has.

I did a lot of shooting for it, both out in the field and in the studio for news pieces. My other glasses (18-55, 50 1.8, 55-250) miss focusing around once in a hundred times, but this one doesn't. This is entirely my fault. Unfortunately, it lacks sufficient crispness. The hues look fine. The ergonomics are excellent, however a thicker zoom ring would have been preferable. I opted for a brand-new, sturdy model with tight-fitting rings. The weight, though, is merely +

A standard workhorse, in point of fact, they are capable of being employed both as a portrait painter and as a landscape painter, as well as a telephoto camera; in fact, they are glass for any and all circumstances. Used for weddings as well as "cultural photography" and picture shoots. In point of fact, the most impressive of all the "universal lenses." Obviously, there is the step that comes after that. 24-70 F4 IS, perhaps the next move, but the inflated price is too much in my opinion; the…

The lens is nice, but there is an issue with the stabilizer that I would want to bring to your attention. Maybe it's just my lens. When the aperture (4) is wide open, the stabilizer performs as it ought to. If we set the aperture to any other setting, for instance 10, the photographs we capture with the stabilizer turned on would appear blurry. In most cases, turning image stabilization off results in more pleasing photographs. Following each shot, the image that appears in the viewfinder is…

Not as sharp as its cheaper, more common counterpart, the 28-135, by a factor of three. A little better and heavier in construction, but 28-135's picture quality is where it really shines. Having 28-135, I went to pick 24-105, did so, removed both under similar circumstances, and returned the 24-105. It's not worth the price they're asking. Simply put, at this price, you will be really disappointed. With the exception of a few models, which everyone knows about, I was once again persuaded that…

When I offered it to you, you bought it from me for 25,000 dollars, despite the fact that it was selling in stores for between 35,000 and 50,000 dollars after the price rise. In general, I am quite pleased with everything; however, I did not care for the sharpness of the whale 18-55; still, here everything is satisfactory. I like everything, including the appearance, the sharpness, and the autofocus. I am extremely happy with the purchase; now, I don't have to drive about with a lot of glasses…

Excellent FF reportage zoom. A dependable machine that gets the job done. Taking artistic shots is out of the question, but that's not the point of this lens. The 24-70 F/2.8 is a step forward in image quality, with completely functional 24mm and 70mm for more intriguing portraits and other uses, etc., but it also costs significantly more, despite the lack of a stub. Given its pricing, the lens has a lot of benefits and disadvantages. Decide whether a large aperture 24-70 or a flexible 24-105…

I purchased a kit with 5dm2 and have been using it for more than two years. The first impressions are good. When I read reviews, I saw that many mention how the stub makes up for f/4. You are partially correct; this is true when photographing static scenes. If the first dance of the young is going to take place in a typical, large restaurant, like Paradise Hall on Domodevskaya (which has a capacity of more than 500 people), you will need to increase the ISO and decrease the shutter speed…

Extremely useful for photographing news stories. Ideal for travel. You should not, of course, anticipate that he would produce an aesthetic photograph for you, but given that the aperture is set at F/4, this is understandable. Whoever is interested in portrait photography will select a larger aperture and a longer focal length for their camera. Despite this, it is possible to focus at 105 millimeters and get a decent portrait with only a touch of blur. Even though there is a stabilizer…

After whales, 2022 glasses through the ring, after 50mm 1.8, 35mm 2, 28mm 2.8, and the rest of a bunch of different rented glasses, but Elka is the first in life, this is the first Elka overall. I think the color reproduction is spot on, and the glass is always razor sharp, which is really unusual after using so many different lenses. When he was using the Canon 700D before he came into my possession, he was using it, and even on that camera, the level of clarity and color reproduction is…

I am by no means an expert, so please be gentle with your evaluations. On the other hand, I've been using DSLRs for close to four years now. Before that, I tried a whale 18-55, then a fifty bucks 1.8 (which I loved for portraits), then an 18-135 (which I kept for two years and sold after only one week of use), and finally, a sigma 75-300 (which I also quickly resold). My mind kept going to L-ke. For the time being, I decided to read. This is what I decided on. I dumped 18-135 for. The first…

I was really dissatisfied with the results of the first pictures I shot with this lens because, even with the aperture wide open, the picture quality was poor. After doing some research (reading articles and reviews, trying it out on a target, in the street, and in the studio), I learned that the minimum usable aperture for crop-factor cameras is f/5.6. When I eventually upgraded to a full-frame camera, I no longer had this issue, and my lens quickly became sharp over the whole zoom range.…

Feeling as content as an elephant Before that, I used a 50mm 1.8 for approximately 1.5 years; nevertheless, the time has come when it's time to change the glass in accordance with the sensations. I purchased it from a friend in the fall for 20 sput; he had converted to a 28-300L and was also delighted that it was on time. I messed it up, and my initial impressions are that yes, things) The quality of the images has substantially improved as a result of comfortable focal lengths. For example…

I never considered selling it while I was using it. As if I had actively sought out drawbacks. I tried and succeeded. But each time, I paused and gave it a fair assessment. And every single time I realized I required it. focal lengths that are quite practical for me. It works well for documentaries. Personally, I think this is significant. The picture's "juiciness" and "razor" sharpness. And all of this is due to the absence of Photoshop. (However, regrettably, there is now. But there…