Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Adam Dziarnowski ᠌ photo
1 Level
338 Review
0 Karma

Review on Watch CASIO A-168WEM-1 by Adam Dziarnowski ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The ratio of price and quality is very pleasing, I will repeat the purchase.

The choice was conscious. I bought it because mineral glass is more scratch resistant than plastic. It is a pity of course that the body is not metal. Another point: in the picture the numbers are read perfectly, in reality the inverse screen is not very readable. Perhaps if the numbers were larger, it would be better. But . However, he did not put up with poor readability (subjectively). After a couple of hours of torment, it was decided to open the watch and refine it to the ideal. The cover is removed, the construct with the filling is removed, the display is dismantled and the polarizing filter is cut off with a clerical knife. The screen naturally immediately went blind. When applying the old filter at an angle of 90 degrees, focus occurs: the background is white, the numbers are black. But the size of the film in this position is naturally not enough to cover the entire screen. Where can I find a new filter? Elementary! With 3D cinema glasses! We cut out a plastic emmm. “point” from the glasses :) Position the cut filter on the display as it should: white background, black numbers. Carefully cut to size and clamp between the display and the constructive. Everything, now as it should!

Pros
  • Vintage, not expensive. This model has mineral glass.
Cons
  • Housing plastic

Comments (1)

Please, sign in to write a comment
June 21, 2023
Has some pros: old school watch, fully cope with their tasks With its cons: Not for business and casual style.