I compare it with OMD-10, which is a class lower and almost three times cheaper. The M-2 is slightly larger and more grippy, but the control is almost the same as that of a dozen, with the same pluses and minuses. In terms of AF speed and image quality, the cameras are identical. Tracking AF - conditionally working. Dust-moisture protection is in doubt - there are no seals on any cover. Working with video is a separate song. During recording, the parameters can only be controlled through a special menu, which must be called after each rack-stop. When using an external microphone, its jack overlaps the tilted monitor, since it opens to the side where all the connectors are. In this case, the open cover prevents the monitor from turning. AF on the video scours even in static scenes, in excellent lighting. My opinion - for a "home" photo you can just as well take OMD-10, the difference is only in a slightly better stub and the presence of 1/8000 in M2.
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Discontinued Canon EOS 7D Digital SLR π· Camera Body Only with 18 MP CMOS Sensor
88 Review
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera Body (Kit Box) - No Lens Included, International Version with No Warranty
298 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review