Review on Canon 8 2MP Digital Camera Body by Jason Sullivan

Let me answer the question at the beginning of this review for those who are not inclined to read everything: the answer is a definite "probably". If you're an advanced photographer, you probably won't be looking at a 30D anyway (unless you needed a DSLR for an emergency like I did), but for the following list of people this is a GREAT place to start: - New photographers - First time owners of one DSLR - students or those on a budget - people looking for a cheap DSLR that still takes good pictures - people looking for a backup DSLR - people looking for a gift for a budding young photographer - etc. Listen She used up around $150. , which is a full-featured digital SLR camera, which was considered high-end gear until 3-4 years ago. I started shooting weddings in 2009 and even then it was kind of a dream camera for an aspiring wedding photographer (the classic full-frame 5D was way too big for my budget). When I look at the pictures taken with this camera, I see that they don't look dated or of poor quality. I used it for my second wedding shoot last week (because my main DSLR is gone and I needed it as a last resort) and the shots turned out really well. Of course you may notice a little noise when enlarging images to make full prints at a higher ISO, but I have NEVER had a client enlarge this image, except for canvas prints which are not exactly known for their high quality are. still prints. Result? Don't be intimidated by fewer megapixels - more does NOT necessarily mean better shots. If I can provide a client with 30D wedding photos that match those in my 1Ds MKIIn (to the unexperienced eye), that's definitely a good choice for any of the above lists, and then some. You can use both EF and EF-S lenses and when combined with one of Canon's L-series (rented) lenses, you'll be shooting like a pro on a budget. I'm a big fan and $150 is far from an investment. Hidden in my gear bag, this little guy might just save the day again.