Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Mateusz Gniazdowski ᠌ photo
1 Level
327 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 4G 8/256 GB, Dual nano SIM, bronze by Mateusz Gniazdowski ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

I am basically composing this review for other future purchasers such as myself. I am a regular phone user, no requirements. I don't even bother with video games. The only reason we required the phone was for personal use (Internet, YouTube, Instagram, and the camera). I spent a lot of time reading reviews, and nearly all of them agreed that the battery life of the phone is by far its most significant shortcoming. In light of this, I was planning on purchasing bodies on Snap; however, in one of the reputable outlets, there was a discount, and I was able to purchase it for 74,991 on exynos 8/256 GB. As a consequence of this, the battery works wonderfully for me, and the phone is quiet enough to last 5.5 to 6 hours with the screen on during regular use. Because the battery takes up so much room, space is not an option. On a different phone that is already one and a half years old (oneplus 7 pro), the battery life lasts for 5.5-6 hours as well; however, the screen on the Samsung is significantly bigger. If you want to look stylish on Instagram or in the browser, 120hz is the way to go, but 90hz on the Oneplus is not that much worse. When Android 11 (oneui 3.0) was installed on the phone, the design of the interface was altered, and users reported that the device began to lag more and twitch more than it did when running Android 10. This is OK in a phone that holds seventy-five pieces, but there is no such thing as a perfect thing like a campaign. Subjectively, there is sufficient performance for regular usage, but it has the impression that there is not much reserve there (this is in reference to using it in games). When I was using the camera, the phone froze up on me for no apparent reason and then automatically rebooted itself. In the same vein, the photographs are not terrible (in contrast to the standards of the camera), but they are impressive for a mobile device. It's great in most cases, especially when you consider the adaptability of the device and the fact that you don't have to bring a second camera with you. The stylus is a neat accessory, however it is primarily used for an additional function. It's great that there is, but there shouldn't be any fanaticism about it. There is a stereo sound, however the sound coming from the lower speaker is noticeably stronger than the one coming from the top speaker, regardless of how the balance is adjusted within the settings. A film, which has been assembled with a high level of quality, is then adhered to the screen at the manufacturer. For those who are debating whether or not to make a purchase, it appears to me that you may make a purchase at a discount for the amount of seventy-five to eighty thousand dollars, however the amount of ninety to one hundred thousand is already questionable. The primary benefit, when compared to the phones released the year before, is a larger screen (unless, of course, you have 10 notes).

Pros
  • 1. Big screen 2. An excellent camera 3. a contemporary design, in contrast to the tens of thousands of other Chinese phones 4. A pleasant user interface
Cons
  • 1. The user interface jerks and lags at a frequency of 120 Hz when running on Android 11 2. Generates heat during the installation of programs and during heavy use 3. There are instances when Gpay payments do not function from the first time (then an exclamation mark indicating that the payment was unsuccessful, then bring your finger to unlock, although the body is already unlocked), but this may be the fault of Gpay itself. 4. The performance of the Exynos processor is not exceptional (considering the price, which is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars), but it is adequate for typical tasks.