Review on Camera Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III Body, black by Mateusz Gniazdowski ᠌

The camera allows you not to spend a lot of time on post-processing of well-shot frames, there is no purple fives, higher sharpness, a different pixel size. They say that the matrices are the same as the fives, but IMHO, this is from the evil one, so that they take the fives more calmly. The camera screen is functionally the weakest point in the camera, it will not show all the sharpness of the frame, it will not show the frame as "mega-chic" as the notorious fives . but on the monitor and paper you can see the best image, unlike the fives, where everything is the opposite - rejoiced, and at home - disappointment in the full sense of the word and a search in Photoshop for "images from the screen." Everything is purely IMHO, from the simultaneous operation of fives and one on the same memory cards, lenses, etc. The skin tone in the portrait is masterfully conveyed by the unit. In general, this is a camera for which the main genre is a portrait, a studio portrait is her strong point. Those who want to believe in high-quality studio shooting with cheap lenses and cameras (still f / 7-11 .) should not be convinced who is in search of the best - sooner or later they will come to this camera or its subsequent models. If only she could add speed in recording to the card and displaying on the screen - 1Dx would not be needed, except for shooting in the dark with televisions :) Comments on ratings: workmanship is excellent, although the first models had problems with shutters - they were changed at the first request in service centers. Adequacy of the price - was not so, now quite good. Ease of use - there is already a more modern model . and more expensive.