Review on Smartphone Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G 8/256 GB Global, Dual nano SIM, Laser black by Stanislaw Gluszek ᠌

I think that this smartphone is an excellent purchase for its price, or rather, for which I took it (21,700 with all the discounts and bonuses on the market from the poco official store). The device has both pronounced pluses and certain minuses. First I would like to say about the design, the design in my opinion is excellent, perhaps even the best among the entire poco line. It looks much more interesting live than in the picture, it feels good in the hand, it feels expensive and pleasant - the assembly is at a high level. The smartphone has an excellent AMOLED screen that supports frequencies up to 120 Hz. The picture is very smooth, the brightness is at a high level, auto-tuning works well, the advantages of the screen are especially visible in bright sunlight. A huge plus of this smartphone is its power system, a powerful battery, complete with a very fast 67 W charge, allows the phone to charge in 40 minutes from 0 to 100. I would also like to note the fairly high-quality sound of the stereo speakers, for some reason, in most reviews, no one talks about this mentions. Cameras are also a plus. True, it is worth saying that they work well only in strong light, for example, on the street in difficult conditions, the picture shows a mediocre one. The downside of this phone can be considered video recording, which is at a completely low level, matching the quality of the budget segment. The macro camera also leaves much to be desired. The controversial qualities of this smartphone include its performance, it will definitely not please gamers, especially Poco x3 fans, however, for everyday use and other tasks, the processor is quite normal. In general, this purchase caused me extremely positive emotions. I consider the above disadvantages to be insignificant for myself: I don’t play games and I’m not much fond of shooting. I consider this phone an excellent purchase for its price. (The official price indicated above, without discounts, is clearly too high)