I scanned about 500 negatives in about five hours. The scanning process is very fast. I just scanned them as is since I run everything through Photoshop anyway, which is much more accurate than the "stepped" features for brightness, color etc. These were old negatives that were 25+ years old , so some colors could change . as well as saturation, which I sometimes found too much. This could have been the result of the original negatives or the scanner, but most of the scans were fairly accurate. A tip: I use lint-free gloves when handling negatives, but old celluloid strips tend to attract dust. This is transferred to the plate in the scanner, where the slides/negatives lie alone and tend to get lost. It will then appear in your scans. They give you a dust removal tool that is very good. However, if you only slide the strips in and out on one side of the insert, dust often gets stuck on the plate. It's best to always go in one direction. This way most of the dust that gets in is pushed out the other side, reducing the number of uses. I also wipe the tool with a piece of tape after each use to prevent tool dust from getting back into the scanner. Second, the base resolution of 14 megapixels is sufficient. A 22MP resolution is only 14MP reinterpolated to 22MP. If you need a higher resolution and are using Photoshop or Corel Paint Shop Pro, interpolate there. You can easily print 16x20 prints with a resolution of 14 MP. The additional 8 megapixels of resolution can only add unwanted artifacts to your image files. I am very happy with this device, as well as my children and grandchildren with memories!
Experience Ultimate Color Accuracy with Epson Perfection V600 Colour Flatbed Scanner
15 Review
Canon CanoScan Lide 300 Scanner, Compact Design: 1.7 x 14.5 x 9.9 inches
22 Review
Canon 0307B001 CanoScan Color Scanner
11 Review
Plustek OpticFilm 8100-35mm Negative Film/Slide Scanner with 7200 DPI and 48-bit Output: Bundle Silverfast SE Plus 8.8, Supports Mac and Windows
11 Review