Review on Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens by Agata Tkaczyk ᠌

Both an older Canon 450D DSLR and a Canon S95 compact are in my possession. Not a pro, just an amateur. I was under the impression that the S95 needed to be replaced, but the sensor on it is just too little. The fact that it does not have a video focusing function is arguably the most common criticism leveled against it. Purchased a Canon A6000. Views are entirely subjective and founded on a contrast to what currently exists. S95 - with its 2.0 aperture at the short end, it does an excellent job with everything that the a6000 is capable of doing. Of course, the a6000 has less noise, but the S95 has a larger sensor. The rate of work is a contentious issue, but if I had to choose, I'd go with the S95. Even when seen at a higher magnification on a screen, the daytime photographs produced by each and every camera are identical. I tried using the Canon 50 with the adapter on the Sony a6000, but it works far better on the SLR; even with the same settings, the picture that comes out of the SLR is superior. That is true what they say about there being "air in the picture." The situation at Sony is a little bit chaotic. And the converse is also true: while shooting with a Sonya camera set to JPEG format, it appears to me that the camera itself applies an AV filter to the background. While using a DSLR, everything is controlled by the aperture value; however, I am unable to alter this control when using a Sonya. Despite the fact that there are no distinguishing features between the two whales. Viewfinder - for me a mirror is better. In general, I somewhat regret that I did not purchase the 200D when I had the chance to do so. And if you want something more compact, then go for the a5100; it has a rotating screen, so nothing will stick to it, and it is more compact than the a6000.