Review on Camera Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III Body, black by Stanislaw Golkowski ᠌

In short - an ideal camera with an excellent matrix and uncompromising photo quality. There were and are 5d, 5d2, 5d3, various crops. For comparison, take shots of black objects on it and at 5d3 with a normal exposure at ISO 3200. Then stretch out 2 stops and feel the difference in color and gray noise. 5d2 is not even close, they only have in common the number of pixels and the body painting technology and that's it! Yes, weak buffer. But he does not pretend to be a reportage, but the fact that he can more than enough for high-quality shooting, both in the studio and on the street. But if you take a photo in jpeg, he will cope with the report. Yes, he's big. But good optics are always big and heavy, the laws of physics cannot be deceived. Take a look at the new RF or Zeiss Otus mounts. Therefore, its dimensions match good optics. Yes, the autofocus sensitivity is -1Ev, but if you don’t take pictures of black cats in a black room, this is enough, for other cases there are flashes with IR illumination, coupled with which autofocus works like lightning. Yes, the painting technology after 5d and 1Ds2 was cheaper, for me, this is the only objective drawback. Yes, the maximum ISO is 3200, but it is absolutely working, even when pulling out color noise at a minimum. My opinion is that his low ratings at the present time are not entirely justified. All successful shots!