Review on Black Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Digital Camera with Wi-Fi, NFC, 1-Inch Sensor, and LCD Screen - 100 - 1066C001 by Abhey Abhey ᠌

Name: Black Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Digital Camera with Wi-Fi, NFC, 1-Inch Sensor, and LCD Screen - 100 - 1066C001
Item: Black Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Digital Camera with Wi-Fi, NFC, 1-Inch Sensor, and LCD Screen - 100 - 1066C001
Rating: 1

September 13, 2022

Absolutely unusable product, not suitable for use.

I will tell you what this expensive toy is for: for taking pictures of yourself at arm's length (the ergonomics are simply disgusting) and for shooting video (only during the day with a lot of light!).
Faces turn out well, and landscapes are completely daub.

What is smart better?
Streaming capability.
Much more: cheap, moisture / dust / vapor proof.
Much less afraid of falls, bumps, etc.
Capable of FAST and discreet shooting.
Much more compact, no need for wretched cases from the early 2022s. And for this bulky vacuum cleaner, a cover is necessary.
Lots of constantly ated photo apps.
The same soap when zooming in on the image as on zh7x.

Pros

Liked the marketing. To foist this weighty piece of lagging trash on the consumer in the age of smartphones. Mark the third turned out even worse, fortunately, I definitely don’t have an extra day for this toy and won’t appear

Cons

Weighty, but unstable on flat surfaces. It is very inconvenient to take a selfie. It is inconvenient to hold the device when you shoot yourself for a vlog (there is simply nothing to hold it for). Vertical photo selfies: you see yourself in the display both on the right side and on the left - upside down. (?!) There is no possibility of streaming, but there is absolutely unnecessary software garbage from the end of the 2022s. Small and slow zoom. You could say it doesn't exist at all. In this regard, the smartphone is not inferior to the device, no matter how poor the zoom is implemented on it. The ability to shoot at night: yes, but the quality is frankly poor. The video makes a lot of noise already in the shade, the photos turn out to be ugly: faded and lifeless, like on some small matrix camera from the mid-to-late 2022s. Defective pixels. They are both on the display and on the final video material. Any kind: jumping points, static spots, flying "asteroids" and so on. On my camera, I counted three (!) different (!) dead pixels on the final video image. Sometimes after pressing the shutter button, it does not take a picture. Apparently he's thinking about something. And the moment is already lost. There is no landscape mode. Instead of a landscape soap soap with sucky detailing. The smartphone takes better pictures. In the dark, it loses focus, or does not focus at all. Frankly inconvenient buttons for turning on the device (hidden in the most inconvenient place) and turning on the video (God, it’s not even upstairs on the blogging camera !). Get used to? And why the heck eat this bitter cactus?! Smartphone: shoots no worse, if not better on the head. Even at night. Almost any modern smart for 10-15 sput. Maybe more expensive. For example, necrota in the form of realm 5 pro + gcam. Post-processing: it's everywhere. And on this w7x with its distortions at the corners. One horse-radish drag a photo after this soap tray in a photoshop. On smart, Photoshop is already built-in and much smarter and faster