Yes, the pictures are great when the children are not moving, not even a little. It takes great pictures when you're outside or not too dark on the AUTO setting. It's easy to use. If it's a gift for a child between the ages of 7 and 18 then it's ok for the money ($166). However, the next picture is taken VERY SLOWLY. If it's for an adult who has babies, toddlers or small children, it's better to spend the money on a better camera. I'm not a photographer, so I'm interested in easy settings and point-and-shoot, but now I wish I'd spent another $200 on a better compact camera. The problem is that the higher the MP, the more space they take up on my computer and external hard drive. Keeping it at 8-12 megapixels seems reasonable, but nothing is cheap. New digital cameras come out with 16MP. it's too much for me Canon's PowerShot S95 has been named one of the top three 10-megapixel digital cameras in consumer reports, and according to Amazon reviews, most are happy with it. I just can't imagine paying $381! For now I'm sticking with this camera because I can afford it. A NOTICE. It seems as soon as consumer reports say the "X" is a great camera, people buy, stocks run out, prices go up and then a new batch of the same model is produced, but that new batch isn't technically as good as first batch. How else could you explain that recent reviews are so lousy?
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera Body (Kit Box) - No Lens Included, International Version with No Warranty
298 Review
Nikon D5100 Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - High Resolution 16.2MP
172 Review
Nikon COOLPIX L810 Digital Camera: 16.1MP, 26x Zoom, NIKKOR ED Glass Lens, 3-inch LCD (Blue)
95 Review
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera with Auto Focus-S Nikkor Zoom Lens (Discontinued by Manufacturer)
109 Review