Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Micha Sarnowski แ Œ photo
1 Level
314 Review
0 Karma

Review on ๐ŸŽฅ Logitech C270 Webcam: Crystal Clear Video and Superior Quality by Micha Sarnowski แ Œ

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not a good product, not worth the money.

Which is why I decided to write a review. There are 300 of them here - in my life I didnโ€™t comment on a product where there are a lot of reviews, but then I decided . Iโ€™ll start with the fact that I only use the webcam to record videos [4: 3] 800 * 600 and 640 * 480. When I bought it, I knew that people wrote super positive reviews about the c270 (gray model) I am at the first entry with max. I was not impressed with the quality. Video in daylight is written with some kind of noise (video gain in the program is 0%) with it if you increase it to 20% already [!@#!@#] on the screen / in quality. Well, I bought it once in 2022/2022, I donโ€™t remember exactly and used it as it was. After a few. years, bugs began to appear as I already wrote above. Then all my methods stopped working and went to study the reviews. On all sorts of cities . kah / reg . dah / rose . kah and other online shops . I read all the negative and average reviews, then I got to otso . ka and airek .nd. In the review, I came across a review with 2 stars that a person has two webcams of these bought at different times. He writes that the old model has a larger matrix than the new one - but I did not focus much on this, but took it into account. A month later, I decided to finish off the topic and looked on YouTube with a dozen repair videos where they showed the filling. What I saw was indescribable - I thought that I had an old revision of the webcam (2022/2022) of the year, but it turns out that it is already new-neutered. I took snapshots and copied myself, then I took a picture on my smartphone from the same angles and eventually noticed that I have a smaller matrix than theirs! I'm shocked. I decide to share this experience. Yes, by the way, any 4: 3 or 16: 9 video is written here with some kind of idiotic parameters - the sound will always be 1400 kbit bitrate and the video is well there according to the settings - this is what - that shooting any video in the video itself will have a volume of 20 -30% and the rest is the 'weight' of the sound, you can't change it in the standard program. Yes, and I need my own parameters, I want to write 1 / 5FPS and the sound was 64-128kbps, but I will look for this in other software ( Very disappointed in the planned obsolescence of the webcam, in the decrease in quality in general .

Pros
  • I'll start with the pluses, this is the quality of the microphone! It's on top. And there are no more pluses as such.
Cons
  • The hypocrisy of the manufacturer (on the site it is indicated that 720p at 30fps is written, but in reality the current is 15fps) More video recording quality with max. settings - it looks terrible (as the manufacturer found out, he began to put small matrices in the webcam) The webcam heats up a lot (even when there is no recording, just in standby mode - as I understand the software, you need to turn off everything!) Through several years (with a rare inclusion for recording 4: 3 video in its own proprietary software with low video quality), the camera started with some defects: either the entire viewing screen was white / then gray / then black - it was treated by pulling it out of the socket 5 times and sticking it back in. Then this method stopped treating these bugs - took it apart - washed away all the flux . For a while it starts without bugs.