Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Gabriela Rogulska แ Œ photo
1 Level
72 Review
0 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ•’ CASIO G-Shock GA-110-1B Wristwatch with Enhanced SEO by Gabriela Rogulska แ Œ

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

Continuing to the cons. 5) Antimagnetic is written on the watch - there is no protection against magnetic waves or static voltage inside the watch. Read the reviews of other watch owners and they will probably write about the fact that the watch is periodically reset to 00:00 - this is the effect of static electricity when removing / putting on sweaters / jumpers and other woolen ones. Just rub the watch against something woolen and it will reset to 00:00 like a short circuit. 6) The design is possible for an amateur, but I donโ€™t like it. But if you buy w-shocks on ebay for 2-3k, then there are 0 claims. The best design, as for me, is with the scams. They have the largest and most informative displays. I will order benches and put their module in the g-shock case, because the j-shocks have a good case, despite the minuses, and the benches have good modules, but the cases are weak. But I want to note that skmey often have quite interesting engineering ideas. I have many different scales and I love watches in general. Here at the benches 0993, the belt is fastened with long screws. Yes, and many models now have fastening either on screws or on โ€œcarnationsโ€, which are simply inserted, but they sit very tightly that they themselves will not fall out for anything. I would very much like Casio to also apply such ideas, and especially make INFORMATIONAL displays on the entire dial, and not bespontovy sticks / circles that carry absolutely no information. I understand that the Japanese have a fetish for whistles and farts, but finally make a watch for people! 7) The LED is absolutely useless. Little yellow on the bottom. There is no way to see the numbers on the display, only the hands are barely in the area between 8 and 5 o'clock. Why not make a fluorescent backlight for the ENTIRE display in hours for 10 thousand? Why does the bench for 500 have a backlight on each model, and on the clock for TEN THOUSAND there is a miserable wick? As if it is so expensive and difficult to make a light substrate for a display for 3 kopecks Summing up, I want to say that from an engineering point of view, the design is crude and the savings are visible on everything. Not worth your money.

Pros
  • 1) Modular design. The case can be called universal. It is compatible with all GA 100 series. Let's say you have a GA-100 that has been worn for a long time and you want a different case, but you can't buy it separately anywhere. Or your clock module has died. You can easily buy a used one on the secondary market, for example, GA-110 and get the module from there and rearrange it in your watch, or your module in that case. Comfortable. 2) Quality of materials. The outer welt (it can also be called a bezel, but it is not correct to call it that) is a good polymer elastic rubber. Light dents straighten themselves (for example, you press a key and a dent remains, it will smooth out over time). 3) High-quality belt, or rather material. Soft for plastic. A little better than Chinese skmeyah. But over time it fades and falls apart. Still plastic, not rubber. 4) Well, mineral glass. Ordinary glass for 3 kopecks. Holds scratches. 5) The last plus, which few people will be interested in, but still - a compact clock module. More precisely, the board on which everything is soldered. Better than most digital watches, but you can do BETTER. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would give it a 7.
Cons
  • Oh-oh-oh-oh . There are a LOT of them. 1) Unreasonably high price. Even at a discount, the price of 7 kilo is now a lot. I would give a maximum of 4500 for such a trinket. At first glance it seems like a RELIABLE thing, but it is not, not at all. The impression is deceptive, in fact, just a beautiful candy wrapper. 2) In terms of engineering design, everything here is done on . "And so it will do!" Inside the clock module, a separate box with gears is soldered with thin copper wires - well, this is just ridiculous. It just rests on the snot, so they are still braided and twisted. Sudden closures - hello! Not only that, he also hangs out! The plastic module has a compartment for a box with gears and there is a gap of half a millimeter, i. E. boxing walks freely there, which means that the arrows themselves will walk a hundred. 3) After a direct hit with the ball on the clock, Khan came to them. The arrows fell off, one gear was out of order, now the clock was left without all the arrows, and the module rattles, the gear dangles there. The fastening of the arrows themselves is terrible and made without temperature considerations. Those. you will go home from frost (-30) at +20 and the fastening of the arrow will easily burst, and the arrow will fall off. 4) The design of the belt fastening is darkness. It's safe to say that it's disposable. Even if you have a tool for removing belts (hour slingshot), then after 2-3 removals you will have a groove from the seat of the rod and this means that the belt can fall out at any time. The plastic of the hour capsule is very soft and scratches easily. The seat is recessed closer to the center of the watch and the bar is inserted into them with great tension, so much so that the bar itself bends and is in a constant state of the arc. If you sharply pull the belt, then the watch capsule can be safely thrown away. The rod will burst in half immediately, leaving behind furrows in which future rods will walk freely. I understand that the plastic should be soft to soften the blows, but if I were an engineer, I would reinforce these places with metal inserts. Those. in fact, g-shock does not live up to its name.