I use it on crop. I took 60d without a staffer, took half a shot to it and later decided that I wanted to shoot landscapes and cars. I bought a one-year-old 17-40 for 18 kilo. And now I have begun to occasionally take in use the regular 18-135. For the life of me, what did I pay 18 thousand for? For the lack of vignetting and a pleasant design. All. In turn, 18-135 has a stabilizer and a larger range of FR. Differences in sharpness, color and other indicators, I do not see. I don’t see any point in peering into the pixels on a computer, such an inconspicuous difference is still not worth that kind of money. (with a camera - 7 thousand for 18-135 and 33 thousand for a new 17-40).