Review on Impact screwdriver Makita TD0101, 230 W by Stanisaw Lem ᠌

Makita is great as always. But most of all I was struck by the very meaning of the screwdriver. I have never used such a device, a powerful screwdriver, yes. But it's great. Previously, to tighten large self-tapping screws, I pre-drilled, even bought a second Shurik. To be honest, it's something else. The upcoming construction of a wooden roof was horrifying. A friend advised me to take a closer look at the screwdriver. I hesitated for a long time whether I need this device. Since I have quite a lot of all kinds of tools and, in principle, I love doing racks, welding and all kinds of repairs on my own, I decided that a screwdriver would not be superfluous in my arsenal. And here is a screwdriver in my hands, a beam of 100 and a hundredth self-tapping screw on a workbench. Zhi, dy, dy, dy and a self-tapping screw instantly in a bar, I am delighted. Unscrewing self-tapping screws is also not a problem, it does not lick the edges like Shurik, but beats and twists it with shock. Now about what is better, mains or battery. The above mentioned friend (also shifted on the instrument) bought a rechargeable one. Also Makita. I bought it without a battery, he already has Makitovsky Shurik s and three mouse batteries of this series. We decided to test the screws on the installation of a wooden hearth in his house - beams, logs, draft, all without problems. Rechargeable on such a volume of work showed itself not very well. The battery, despite the very large number of ampere hours, sat down quickly, naturally efficiency suffered from this. My network buenil just come on. An integral plus of mine is smaller and lighter than the battery. But the wire is a minus. My conclusion is the following. If you need to unscrew, screw in a small amount, then of course it is a battery, but for a large amount of work and where there is 220, then undoubtedly a network one. We were satisfied with both.