Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ahmad ᠌ photo
Lives in Jakarta, Indonesia
1 Level
130 Review
167 Karma

Review on 32" TV Samsung UE32T4500AU 2020 LED, HDR RU, black by Ahmad ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

I did not find the advantages of the product, I do not recommend it.

Has some pros As a cheap balalaika to the country, it will do for itself. I have all Samsung TVs, the same type of remotes. Relatively convenient menu. In the kit they gave a corner for the antenna plug. Has some cons But! When buying Smart TV, I would like, at a minimum, to preserve intellectuality, and as a maximum, to develop it. Looking ahead, I am more than sure that the domestic TV firmware is to blame. 1. The TV was bought to replace (the matrix burned out) a similar Samsung 32 TV - the old TV caught two digital slots (20 channels), the new one caught only 10. The antenna, of course, did not change - the reception conditions are the same. 2. HERE I'm SHOCKED - everything is visible from the flash drive, folders, files, but some video files are not produced (previously they were perfectly readable on the old TV) - that is, more than half of the problematic files. ated TV software - the problem remained. Developers, wow! Codecs must be cumulative. For this jamb telly confident ban! There is a suspicion that the TV firmware somehow reads the titles of video files, tags and bans them by names like "video search. name of a famous movie." Of course, these files are all downloaded from torrents. So, as a way out of the situation - I'm thinking of buying a well-known media set-top box so as not to encounter such "jokes" of domestic TV firmware. And yes, I'll probably try to flash the TV with imported firmware to solve the problem. 3. The on-screen menu when switching channels was changed - everything began to look more miserable. Not critical, but still. In short, for the first time in 15 years, I caught the fuuu effect from Samsung TV products