Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Adam EK ᠌ photo
1 Level
349 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EOS 6D Body camera, black by Adam EK ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

rating of 5 solely for the standards he satisfies in order to support himself; for those who appreciate reading, I will now add a TON of truth. I purchased a replacement since I had endured persistent harassment on the internet, in discussion forums, and other online communities (700D + 18-135stm). I initially intended to get six-dimensional plus two glasses right away, but I was unable to decide between them, so I settled with the three-month plan instead. My favorite photographic themes include travel, landscapes, macro, and portraits, and my approach is more reportage-like. This is why I was seeking for a camera that could handle macro and portraiture as well as all of these disciplines. comparison 6d plus 700d plus 18 to 135 stm The detail in the 6d+Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is worse. a Tamron AF SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD lens and a Canon 6D Canon EF is less detailed. The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM on the 6d produces less detailed images. The detail in the 6d+Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM is worse. Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM with a 6D The edges are the weakest, with the center and sides being better. It is impossible to find a universal standard lens for landscapes and tourism for less than 104t. R. for a zoom, which will actually not zoom very much because in terms of crop, this is 15-44mm continue: Thanks to the 6d and the Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM lens, it is sharper than my 18-135stm in this picture. With the Canon EF(art) 6d+Sigma AF 24-35mm f/2 DG HSM, the 6d+Sigma AF 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM is sharper. The next camera to be assessed for sharpness was the Canon EF(art). using 1-2 cameras, whose lenses are aimed on a stand, poster, fence, or other object more than 20 meters away. 2. The computer screen is filled with both of the blown-up frames that were received. As a result, I was unable to realize my vision of a high-quality, universal camera because there isn't a good zoom lens for wide to mid rangs. It would not be able to use the camera for macro or portrait photography without such a lens. sold a camera! because of the following: 1) There are times when I can't switch lenses quickly, and there are also times when I don't want to (Asian showers, sandy beaches, and just insects) 2) Carry three lenses and a 6D that weigh more than three kilograms and cost more than $200, and increase the caliber of landscape pictures by 2% to 5% while doing so (in the afternoon) I will add, however, that if you make the same alterations to the 700D (day), it will be almost the same if you need 6D for a work that is particularly specific and needs a fix!

Pros
  • + ISO (any Canon 600D, 650D, 700D, 60D, or 70D, in addition to the 6D - these cameras produce a very small amount of noise even at 100 iso, which is really corrected in the editors. Nonetheless, colors on large ISOs are not lost, and raw files are handled a little bit more quickly, starting at 1600 ISO and continuing all the way up to 6400 ISO (the limit of the 6D flagship). Everything they mention about the 6D's high ISO performance is generally accurate! + Entire frame, and to be more precise - depth of field (DOF) - it's really wonderful for portraits and for situations when you only want to spotlight something =) + Colors, color reproduction is plainly 5–10% better than the 700d, and the higher the ISO, the more evident this difference becomes. + Compared to crop cameras, the handle is more pleasant to hold (more) + REVIEW IN THE VIDEO FINDER + ONE OF THE LIGHTEST FULL-FRAME CAMERAS + FUNCTIONS IN THE MENU - AUTO FOCUS CORRECTION, SETTING THE MINIMUM SHUTTER SPEED IN APERTURE PRIORITY MODE, DETAILED BATTERY INDICATOR (AS A PERCENTAGE FROM 1% TO 100% - YOU WILL ALWAYS KNOW) + ONE OF THE LIGHTEST FULL-FR
Cons
  • - the Canon 5Dm3's lack of additional chips, in addition to the fact that it currently costs from 80,000 rubles plus glass;

Similar reviews