Review on 🔌 Merkmak Electric Cordless Air Duster: Rechargeable 15000mAh Battery, Powerful 45000 RPM, LED Light - A Handy and Efficient Computer Cleaner by Brian Nelson

So, a stark comparison with this product is the ubiquitous compressed air canister. Which of these two products wins in a direct comparison? My reflex answer is a cordless air purifier. However, there are "critics" who enumerate reasons why this assessment is wrong. reasons why it wins. less landfill if you don't recycle an empty air tank, ozone depletion isn't a strong argument either, since fluorocarbons haven't been used in compressed air tanks for about a decade. And compressed air tanks do a better job. Au contraire mon frère. The air coming out of this device is very strong. While it won't get rid of that "film" dust with a standard nozzle, the same can be said for a can of compressed air. There are two nozzle heads, one with soft bristles around the orifice where the air is distributed to get rid of that "film" dust. The charging time is about 7-8 hours. Some might think this is a long time in the world of device charging. I left mine on overnight and then a little longer. There is no indication on the display of how much charge is left. This is the best scenario until the cordless air purifier starts to noticeably dry out. I used it quite a bit the first time I used it. On my silk plants, lampshades, books, shelves, picture frames, film collections, fan blades, computer equipment, furniture. After all that, the air purifier had even more power for other purposes. Eventually, a non-removable battery will develop a memory that causes it to hold less charge. Which in turn ends up in landfill if you don't recycle it. That day is in the distant future. And since I don't dust regularly, this cordless duster might outlive me. Recommend