The device was taken for amateur shooting under water, snorkeling in the Red Sea . in this capacity, so far it has justified itself by 100%. We should try to take a picture with a teleconverter (although the price bites). Underwater photos turn out high-quality, even at photos with a zoom. Before that, a sports kodak was used for these purposes, the difference is huge (though the price of the devices is also . the kodak cost 2t. R, the oil cost 15 + subsequent repair 5t. R for a broken battery cover . that's where the vaunted impact resistance) . On land, the photos are of high quality, you just need to reduce the compression in the settings. The video shoots high-quality, both under water and above water)) Yes, the noise from the zoom is heard, but this is not a significant minus. XZ-1 shoots video much worse, because there are problems with autofocus, there are no such problems here. By the way, in a fire accident, the battery from the XZ-1 came up, although it was thinner and dangled in the compartment, but it coped with the function and saved photography until the end of the day. The battery lasts for a long time, but continuous shooting drains it a lot, this must be taken into account. I don't really need a GPS. As a nice addition - a barometer and a compass, you can then look at the photographs at what depth or height the photograph was taken.
Waterproof Case for DSLR Cameras: DiCAPac WP-S10 Pro Series
9 Review
๐ท Nikon W300 Waterproof Underwater Digital Camera with TFT LCD, 3-inch, Yellow (Model 26525)
9 Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 - Rugged 16.1 MP Digital Camera with 8x Intelligent Zoom (Black)
15 Review
Photo camera Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II, black
35 Review