Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Andrey Orlovski ᠌ photo
1 Level
258 Review
0 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 40 mm Wi-Fi NFC RU, vanilla/pink by Andrey Orlovski ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

It cant be worse! A waste of money.

So I went out and bought myself this wonder. Rosset is 25k in price for a second. That is to say, the price is already exorbitant. The watch itself is not horrible; it is made in a smart, stylish, and animated way. But that is definitely not working. They don't even write their software from the written word. One average yi, or formal applications. In general, I find it difficult to comprehend how a product may be sold in 2022 without having WhatsApp, Telegram, and similar services. Notifications don't display images, stickers, dialogues, or the ability to switch between them. They also don't make it easy to send or receive audio notes, watch movies, or talk on the phone through the messenger's call feature. Additionally, auto-awakening performs terribly when the watch is turned to the face (1 out of every 5-6 times). Will this watch be available in 2022? All of this, which I detailed in the negatives, is possible with Apple Watch. Take the previous model of Apple Watch, and in general, it will be even less expensive. If it were possible to link to an android, I would do so right away because, for almost the same price, they currently have no competitors. In short, Samsung's tale is the same: they overcharge the market, yet they provide a product that has a lot of flaws and complexities, exposing themselves once more as, to put it gently, a business that lacks reason, intelligence, and accountability. You would think that if you put a price tag of $15,000 there would be no issues at all, but no. Nothing else to say about courage and dementia.

Pros
  • Stylish, high-end, excellent drawing, excellent Samsung native programs, and outstanding battery life. But that's insufficient.
Cons
  • - All notifications originate through the native notification capability in the same way; you may just view a message from this or that application, for example. When they send two or more messages at once, you can only view the text and the location of the photo, which is only [photo]. If only one message arrives, you can also see the photo. Elon Musk, how do you like that? Samsung writes [picture] in the place of the photo in just hours while you are there firing rockets. I already don't speak about audio notes, stickers, videos, some sort of message navigation, etc., so this is completely unnecessary. Nothing is watched, recorded, or listened to. That is, it is practical to only display the notification that has arrived. Then, if there are two or more people reading or watching this message, you must open the bodies for both the video and the audio. In other words, given the state of the world today, 80% of these notifications are meaningless. In a nutshell, it would have been applicable five years ago if there had been no software. There isn't even a tracker for cycling, skiing, or snowboarding, let alone WhatsApp or Telegram. If there are any applications, they are created on a disabled person's knee, cost $300–$600, and are completely useless—they operate incorrectly, are unattended, lack support, and so on. True, it is important to note that the huge market has quality sports applications like endomondo, etc. Despite the fact that it is only a small issue, the sleep phases are not appropriately counted. I can get up, lie down, and talk on the phone while still having time to work and sometimes even talk on the phone itself, but the clock only records my rising once I have left the bed. The clock there keeps track of my sleep phases and how deep I slumber, and I keep getting less sleep. Such junk was not found on the same mi bands for 1.5k. It goes without saying that for me, this is a significant event. I keep track of my sleep patterns and bedtimes, and occasionally it's important to look back on the past. However, after a week, you naturally forget and lie around for 10 to 40 minutes.