Review on Camera Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10M4, black by Wiktor Iwanski ᠌
A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.
Impressions are ambiguous. Honestly. I am writing a review and trying to understand who wascomunted on when creating the camera. Let me explain - on the one hand, this is an ideal travel camera with acceptable image quality. Let not immediately, but with post-processing. But the result will not disappoint. It is not inferior incomnvenience to cameras with interchangeable lenses, and maybe it will give odds to some. The range of focal lengths will simply satisfy anyone, but if you calculate how much theycomst and weigh (! ) Similar lenses. well, ofcomurse) On the other hand, the price tag is from a camera with a larger sensor and a pair of glasses. Yes, even if not of such a range and sensitivity. But still. The camera took every award possible - EISA, TIPA, DPREVIEW. There are nocomments here. But who is it for at this price? I would suggest that for those who choose between a set of optics and a camera with a larger sensor and those who don't really care about the budget and want an all-in-one travel camera. Well, or as in my case, when there is a T-20 with a standard lens and when there is not enough telephoto lens and you don’t want to bother with changing them (plus the weight andcomst of such a kit will definitely be higher). Decide for yourself. I will be glad to answer questions. : I don’t add to the minuses, just for information - in order to get a "complete set" I bought in addition: - UV filter - polarik - battery - mains charger - powerbank - high-speed memory card 128 GB And shed a tear. ) The instruction from the camera thatcomes with the kit can be thrown away, here is the normal one:
- Hi all. The review will be supplemented, now the first impressions, as they say "out of the box", after a seven-hour walk around the zoo with a camera: 1. Despite several hours of walking with the camera, I can say that the camera, despite a little over a kilo, is very comfortable to use. Its solid volume is rather a plus, because. it is very comfortable to hold, plus the wide strap is incomparably more comfortable than from my Fujifilm X-T20 camera. 2. Zoom. This could be put boldly in the first place. I have not yet analyzed what focal lengths were the most popular for the shots taken, but the opportunity to get a close-up of flamingos or birds in aviaries, as well as a close-up of a giraffe's face - before that, I could only dream about this with my regular 18-55. 3. Image quality: after the first camera with APS-C, I was very worried about the amount paid, but when I displayed the image on a 4K TV, I was pleasantly surprised. Even the marabou's lashes came out crisp, not to mention the detail in feathers or animal fur. 4. Autonomy. Mindful of the declared 370 shots (in ideal conditions), I bought a second battery. But I never used it for 7 (! ) hours, although I also shot videos, in addition to photos. Now he shows a full discharge, but this is more than acceptable. 5. What I liked constructively: a folding screen (it’s convenient to take a picture above a crowd of tourists), customizable buttons (it got the functionality of a system camera), convenient control rings on the lens (the developers obviously decided to compete with more serious cameras), a lens hood in the kit (a trifle, but nice). 6. The camera can be charged directly from the power bank (having a battery of 10,000 milliamps, you get a huge autonomy). 7. Video recording in 4K. In general . you can list the pros for a long time, despite the fact that I have not yet delved into the fine settings. I will add later what should have been emphasized. Now to the cons
- 1. Price! I took it from my hands for 90.000. At prices from 100 to 129 for a camera from the store. For such an amount, you can consider a number of cameras with APS-C sensors and a pair of lenses) 2. Noises. The size of the matrix imposes restrictions and serious ones. You can't argue against the laws of physics, no matter what they write in advertising releases and "independent" reviews. Up to 400 ISO inclusive, you can safely shoot. If you want higher - get ready to mess with RAW files, and maybe photoshop. The small size of the matrix is \u200b\u200ba fee for the focal length of the lens . I will say this - an inch matrix - the lower threshold of image quality. "Competitors" with matrices 1/2.3 inches and focal length of the telescope, in fact, are not competitors. This is a calculation for the "wow" effect, which will quickly pass. It is clear that this is IMHO. 3. Not a minus, but I will add it here. Last night I went to Red Square and across the entire square I got a close-up photo of St. Basil's Cathedral, on which the brickwork is perfectly visible . from the 20th time. In low light, normal pictures can only be taken with a tripod, here the stabilizer is powerless. Well, or prohibitive ISO with noise . 4. To shoot 4K video, you need an expensive memory card - a minus, because it weighs down the budget. 5. Forget bokeh. I won’t say that the camera turns the background into a muddy mess, but you can’t count on highly artistic bokeh. I would like to find fault with something on the go, but I can’t yet.
New products
Comments (0)
Similar reviews
Top products in 📷 Camera & Photo Accessories
Another interesting products
A Durable And Protective CaseSack For Bose QuietComfort And SoundLink Headphones
41 Review
Soft Silicone AirPods Case Cover With Visible LED - Compatible With AirPod 2/1 Cases, Keychain Accessory Included - Ideal For Men, Women, Girls, And Boys - Light Pink
37 Review
Protect Your Earbuds On-The-Go With Small And Portable EVA Case - Perfect For Airpods, USB Drives, Cables And More!
34 Review
Canon Nikon Sony Panasonic FujiFilm Olympus Pentax DSLR Camera Bag, Evecase Large Vintage Canvas Messenger SLR Shoulder Strap Case - Gray
45 Review