Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Agata Wiatrowska ᠌ photo
1 Level
168 Review
0 Karma

Review on Buy the Original White Venta LW25 Humidifier for Exceptional Air Quality by Agata Wiatrowska ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Second-rate goods, I wont buy any more.

1. It goes without saying that the price tag is absurdly inflated for such a straightforward construction that is made of solid plastic. Furthermore, given the shortcoming that was described, it is just a scam. 2. Citizens who applaud the effectiveness of this device, I was wondering if any of you have compared the humidity levels in the room when it was being used and when it wasn't being used. Perhaps the placebo effect could be at play here as well))) I didn't let my laziness get the best of me and tested the humidity in a room that was 20 m2 using a home weather station. The end consequence is that the humidity in an area around one meter in radius around the gadget has increased by approximately fifty percent. Nonetheless, it was well worth it to move the humidity meter three meters in a different direction because the effect is null during the day. It is true that I conducted my tests during the winter, when the air quality in my flat was particularly poor. In a space that is 20 meters in length, I believe that the desired outcome may be achieved with three to five of these types of equipment. The first is merely there for aesthetic purposes. Despite this, he found a use for it. When placed next to home flowers, it makes those flowers seem like a much more enjoyable activity. 3. There is one more significant point that needs to be brought up, and it is one that the manufacturers do not emphasize very much in their advertising. The apparatus requires regular maintenance and water of a particularly high quality. If proper care is not taken, the apparatus must be washed completely once per week at the very least; otherwise, the water that is contained within it will go rancid. If you use tap water for an extended period of time, lime deposits will build up on the whole interior surface of the device as well as the lamellar cylinder, making it extremely difficult to clean. In order to clean it, I had to immerse the insides of everything in vinegar for two days. After that, I made the decision not to pour any water from the faucet. I utilize reverse osmosis. After six months, the insides have been thoroughly cleaned. In a nutshell, the idea behind how the device works is brilliantly straightforward, yet the current iteration of the product is not only ineffective but also unreliable and outrageously overpriced.

Pros
  • A straightforward design, low overall power usage, and premium-grade plastic all come standard.
Cons
  • Inadequate quality of the electronic elements, all of which are already of the barest essential. In my particular circumstance, for some inexplicable reason, the touch switches fail (the buttons are shorter). After only a year of extremely light use, the device became unresponsive to the power button being pressed. Climbed to the top, unsoldered it, and then soldered the following one (which was used as a fuse for opening the top cover). A couple of months later, it caught fire, and because there are two safety switches, it needed to be soldered again.

Similar reviews