Review on Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits by Elang ᠌

Of course, this is not a physical cant, rather a feature. In general, I fell for the myth that Sony is a good choice for shooting video, I also fell for the advice of my uncle photographer. In fact, the quality of both the video material and the sound from the camera upset me very much ! I can write a lot about this, so already in three months I got the impression and opinion about the Sony SLT 65 camera, which, unfortunately, I bought in the blind hope that this camera manufacturer would be a better choice for video than even the Canon 650D or Nikon D3300 or D5300 . Why is the sound from Sony so rotten, from the built-in microphone, from the external . the sound compression quality is ONLY 256 Kb / s ! Against the soapy bitrate of 1541 Kb/s from my second Canon PS 220 HS camera. This already characterizes the manufacturer Sony as the most undesirable option to purchase! Why is the sound from a competitor's camera soap boxes an order of magnitude better than the sound of an average camera ? About the video is a separate conversation, the bitrate also eloquently indicates the quality of the picture. Canon since 650D writes video from 47 Mb/s at 24 frames! Nikon D3300 at 50 frames writes almost 40 Mb / s . Sony "the best option for video" writes a maximum of 28 Mb / s in its sub-codec AVCHD and then actually less - the answer to my question, why is the detail worse than from my soapbox. Maybe things are better with the new XAVC S codec with 50 MB/s, but personally I haven't noticed a strong difference yet. I do not know how long I will be destined to use this Sony a 65, but for the future I know for sure that I will no longer contact this company. I finished it up and didn’t buy what the people of Canon and Nikon are getting, I wouldn’t have known the problems then.