Review on Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens by Anastazja Kowalik ᠌

Overall, the camera is really good; however, in order for the photographs to be distinguishable from those shot on a soap box or an iPhone, a significant amount of money needs to be invested in the camera. Dissatisfied with Sony's pricing and fees. In most cases, I will wait for possible new solutions to be released by Canon or Olympus before purchasing a new camera. Pros: The camera's portability, quick autofocus, and high image quality when used with regular glass (good SEL35F18, for example, from "budget" ones). A remarkable variety of uses and applications (for the most part I do not use, however). The existence of buttons that can be programmed. Transferring photographs to mobile devices can be accomplished with ease. Great video. Got cons: - The price, it is now high even for a carcass, and overall, in order to get good pictures and convenient work with the camera, you need to invest another 1-2 carcass costs. This brings the total cost of purchasing the camera to more than the cost of a carcass. In addition, Sony has a peculiar pricing policy, as evidenced by the fact that at the start of the year, in conjunction with the strengthening exchange rate, it raised all prices by 10,000 at once. - An unexpectedly uncomfortable grip - Overheating when watching video - A short amount of time for actual work You are need to charge the battery for the basic kit by using the camera itself, which is a time-consuming and cumbersome method that prevents you from using the camera while it is charging. In other words, there will immediately be costs associated with purchasing an additional battery as well as human charging. - Kit lens 16-50: dark, not outstanding. Will be sold as a wide of average quality (has a robust barrel and was unable to achieve the typical level of sharpness, but it will do for the countryside) - The bad condition of the glass park is one of the most common concerns. After a very respectable amount of time, the selection of E-mount lenses has become somewhat limited. The least expensive option is a pair of dull and uninteresting glasses. Fixes numbers 50f18 and 35f18 of the good and does not declare bankruptcy. There is not even the slightest space available to play around in order to acquire a decent aperture width. A typical zoom lens starts at a price of sixty thousand dollars, if one is desired (for example, SEL-1670Z). There are still Samyangs and Sigmas, but even so, I need a stub in addition to autofocus. - Normal "zoom" with manual focus only works with native lenses; if you use, for example, Soviet ones with an adapter for m42, you will need to adjust the button, press it, and walk around the frame in order to zoom. Normal "zoom" with autofocus only works with native lenses. - Another significant criticism is that the camera does not work very well in general. No way. The user interface is not flawless, but it will not undergo any more development because going forward, any new firmware will simply offer support for more expensive lenses. Especially now that the A6300 has been released, features are not being added (and artificial limits are not being removed), either. To put this into perspective, Fujiki inserted a fully electronic shutter into the updated firmware, while Sony did the same thing with their new camera. - The lack of a touch screen, which would make it easier to concentrate on content (it is inconvenient to drive the zone). It's odd that the A6300 doesn't have it either, considering how much money you have to pay for it.