Review on City backpack POLAR П1955, blue by Micha Gabriel Czajko ᠌

The best of the best. The case when you want to put 6 out of 5! Used daily for 9 years! Now I'm thinking of getting a new one. For a change, I'll take a Polar P1956 (exactly the same backpack, with a slightly different design). I will also use this backpack as a backup option for "dirty" trips (caves, abandoned objects, etc.). Some pros: - Ease of use (back, shoulder straps, double zippers) - Durability (most backpacks of much more popular and well-known companies fall apart after 2 years. This one will last 5 years at worst) - Capacity (27 liters for the city - the best option) - Practicality (a large number of compartments and internal pockets for small things) - Design (there are also a couple of other models with similar characteristics) - Adequate price (pl compared with analogues). Different cons: - A couple of times a month I meet people on the street with the same backpacks. Perhaps for someone this fact is critical (the backpack will not be unique). In this case, I advise you to take a model not black, but, for example, red, then there will be an order of magnitude fewer matches. - No models with skate/snowboard/ski bindings - After 5 years of use, the plastic belt carabiner broke (it was my fault, they walked through it a couple of times), after 8 years of use, two small holes were rubbed at the bottom of the main compartment, after 9 years the zipper of the main compartment broke. As for me, all this is not critical, because. easy to remove (you can always sew, sew in a new zipper or buy a new carabiner), especially considering that the thing is used every day!