For a very long time, I was unable to decide between the Sigma 70-300 and the Nikon, and as a consequence, the Nikon proved to be the superior option. For those who write that it's a bit dark in the room, then the aperture is written on the lens, and expecting from him that he will be like portraits with 2,8 or 1,8 is stupid, and I can't imagine in what rooms such a lens might be needed, the second was written about slow autofocus, when compared with 35mm 18-140, I didn't see a difference; the camera has the possibility of 3D focusing; therefore, I think it's quite realistic to shoot Everything functions very well; however, it might have more high-end glasses and run more quickly; still, the price is reasonable, and there are no other issues. In general, the lens is fairly nice; the only complaint that can be leveled against it is that it has become increasingly pricey to purchase from us; the going rate in the city at the time of the purchase was $80,000. The quality, on the other hand, can in no way be compared to that of equivalent Tamron or Sigma models.
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Fixed Lens - Discontinued by Manufacturer
93 Review
Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
124 Review
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183)
125 Review