Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Chase Arellano photo
Ukraine, Kiev
1 Level
684 Review
43 Karma

Review on 🎧 Enhance Your Audio Experience with JVC Wood Series - New Metal Harmonizer, Wood Dome Unit, and Detachable MMCX Cable - HAFW01 by Chase Arellano

Revainrating 5 out of 5

JVC HA-FX850 WAS MANUFACTURED. NEW HEADPHONE KING - JVC CLASS-S HA-FW01!

MY DISCLAIMER: Sound preferences are inherently subjective. So what seems excellent to me may not necessarily be your cup of tea. As for the background, I prefer a V-shaped sound with an emphasis on bass and treble. I've also had a variety of headphones and earbuds ranging in price from $20 to $1500. I consider myself musical and play the piano by ear. REVIEW I have now replaced my previous high quality JVC HA-FX850 headphones with the flagship JVC HA-FW01 headphones. Yes, they cost almost twice as much as the 850s, but if you're like me and the sound quality has improved a lot (and you have the financial means to upgrade), I think it's worth taking the plunge. JVC HA-FW01 - that's also a matter of personal opinion. The premium flagship JVC HA-FW01 headphones were compared to the very popular and highly acclaimed JVC HA-FX850. First, the cable in the JVC HA-FW01 is covered in fabric, not rubber in the 850s. I feel the JVC HA-FW01 is a bit lighter than the 850 but still has some weight. I prefer the look of the JVC HA-FW01 as they are black rather than wood brown (again my preference). You get a nicer leather case with the JVC HA-FW01. In terms of sound quality, I find the JVC HA-FW01's bass to be more refined, but still deep and deep. It's more manageable and less "boomy" than the 850. Don't think that that means the JVC HA-FW01 doesn't deliver significant bass - it does, however, without problems. The bass was solid and full and the highs were crystal clear and clear. Medium is perfect in my opinion. The soundstage was wider than the 850's and the 850's had a decent soundstage. Compared to the 850s, the 850's soundstage now feels a bit more focused. The high frequencies were noticeably more detailed, clearer and crisper. In terms of sound quality, I find the JVC HA-FW01's bass to be finer but still deep. It's more controlled and less "boomy". Don't think, however, that this means the JVC HA-FW01 doesn't deliver significant bass - it does so with no problem. The soundstage was wider than that of the 850s. With the JVC HA-FW01, the highs were noticeably more detailed, cleaner and crisp. Perhaps the best way to describe the difference between the JVC HA-FW01 and the 850 was the vastly improved separation and crisp detail between all playing instruments. I could see where it might sound bright to some, but I think it's better described as clean sound. When I first fell in love with the 850s (after the return of the Shure 846), I didn't think there was room for improvement. on sound quality. Remember I compared the sound quality of the 850s to my Fostex TH900. But now that I've compared the sound between the 850 and the JVC HA-FW01, there's no doubt which will reproduce the phenomenal sound quality of my Fostex TH900. My new premium in-ear headphones are the JVC HA-FW01. When I thought my search for the 850s was over, I humbly corrected myself. The JVC HA-FW01 comes highly recommended for those who don't want to settle for less than the best sound. Is the price worth it? Well, if you have the means, I say absolutely. Are they worth the price difference between the 850s? In my opinion, yes. But again, it's your choice! Hope that helps! FOR THOSE INTERESTED - below is my previous review of the JVC HA-FX850s: The HA-FX850 has excellent sound with a 'wow' bass factor. If you are a basshead you will love this. If you like V-shaped sound, you will love it. Does the bass dominate? Yes. Is there too much bass? No, not in my opinion. Unmatched lows don't drown out highs and highs aren't emphasized. I love deep bass and brilliant, detailed highs. I compare them to Fostex TH900. They sound like full-size headphones and have a wide, distinctive soundstage. I've been looking for in-ear headphones for years, I've even had the flagship Shure 846. I prefer the sound of these JVC Ha-Fx850s for a lot more and for about 1/3 the price. Unlike many in-ear headphones, they don't require a lot of power to operate. My usual complaint when listening to music on my phone is that the volume gets inadequate. There are no problems at all with these. I've had and am trying probably more than 3 dozen high-end headphones. Here my search ended. Highly recommended. Perhaps your search is over. UPDATED 7/12/17: I would downgrade to 4.5 for cable. While the fabric coated cable and the cable itself offer great sound quality (I've compared three other aftermarket cables and the original is still the best), the cable will sync and deform over time due to the fabric coating. They had to make this cord with a rubber or plastic sleeve. Over time, the cord looks ridiculous.

Pros
  • Pleasant
Cons
  • Mostly OK, but...