Review on Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens, black by Mateusz Mazurkiewicz ᠌

- a very high price, but generally speaking, it is justified because the lens is L and there is a difference with /1.4. - Not the best autofocus by modern standards (but fairly decent), the infamous shift focus that is inherent in such large relative apertures. - Up to about 1.8 holes are not working at all in the open due to terrible HA and low sharpness - in relation to the two points that came before this one: The 85 mm f/1.2 Canon is even more exact with autofocus than the 50 mm f/1.2 Canon, which was the first of the two. - slightly outdated (2022), which explains why the autofocus, sharpness, and HA cannot compete with new lenses, not even zooms of the same price (this refers to the 24-70 II and 70-200 II, of course), but somewhere (in terms of sharpness and HA) and fixes (non-L) and zooms (L) are cheaper, but newer. - somewhat outdated, indicating that buying it won't be very beneficial because it needs to be updated, which will lead to a big price decrease for the product in question. Otherwise, it's no longer funny because the EF 35 / 1.4L USM was announced in 1998 and doesn't even have dust-mist protection. As for the rest, the new half-tone hasn't been heard yet. Around the beginning of 2022, the 35L ate is finally audible. Otherwise, it stops being humorous. - With the exception of aperture, the EF 24-70 II outperforms him in each of the other categories. Beginning in 2022, there will be a price differential of about 10-15K between the two lenses: about 50K for the 50 mm and 60-65K for the 24-70 II.