Bought for running training and because this is the only watch that does not feel on the hand. Compared with Garmin Forerunner 645. AW 5: - the track is smoother, - no need to wait for connection to satellites, - no vibration. Tactile tapping every km. This is an amateur item. Usually they are compared with Garmin Fenix 5-6, but in my opinion this is unfair. AW even cost 2 times cheaper. Accordingly, the functionality is different. But there are no complaints about the accuracy of measurements, any. - AW also has the best optical heart rate monitor. At the competitions, he counted the pulse up to the finishing 196 beats. - unlike any, even the top-end Garmin Fenix 6, it never made a mistake when calculating the distance in the pool. Not once in a year. That's 54 visits. Garmin boldly throws from 50 to 400 meters at a distance of 1500. I don’t understand this. The company positions itself as a manufacturer of the best sports watches, but it is impossible to set up software to count pools. - you can connect an external heart rate monitor. Though Polar, Garmin or in my case Kalenji - I've been using it for a year, no scratches
Black Audio-Technica ATH-M50X Professional Grade Studio Monitor Headphones with Detachable Cable - Critically Acclaimed
200 Review
SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch Active2 (Aqua Black, R820-44mm) 📱 with Bluetooth, Silicon Strap, and Aluminum Bezel - International
248 Review
Global Version HUAWEI Band 6 Fitness Tracker Smartwatch for Men and Women, 1.47’’ AMOLED Color Screen, All-Day SpO2 and Heart Rate Monitoring, 2-Week Battery Life, 5ATM Waterproof - Orange
190 Review
Sennheiser HD280PRO: 🎧 Next-Generation Pro Audio Headphones
260 Review