Review on Timeless Elegance: Charles Hubert Paris 3576 🕰️ W Mechanical Pocket – A Classic to Treasure by Peter Zouhair

Not just a spam fan review, I waited almost a month before writing this. Edit: A few years later I still like it (10/2013) Pros: Nice silver watch Keeps a decent time Good size Durable (had a month so we'll see) Moderately scratch resistant (not brittle but not titanium either) The price is right. Mechanical pocket watch that is easy to wind. Cons (minor things): side clocks (personal matter, I prefer 12 on the chain) can't see the gears from the back, only clockwise from the side 4 is IIII from IV instead (picky again) - EDIT: obviously he did with the old one Doing tradition, the comment below has more details. Be careful with the locking mechanism to close it, always push the button when you close it, you'll thank me for that later. Other Thoughts: Would love to see it in rose gold/brass color. Despite the appearance of the pocket clip, it really is an old fountain. The wing mirror finish is a perfect silver tone while the interior has a circular brushed texture, all gears seem to work harmoniously like clockwork, giving the mechanics an almost lifelike feel. The gems and screws add a pop of color in addition to the silver and brass gears, the quartz stones sparkle and the screws have a purple (at least mine was) protective coating that makes them look like someone has a chip of amethyst put inside. The clock's ticking is loud enough that you can hear it if you put your ear close to it, but it won't bother you as long as it's on a table or in your pocket. to the server) at work, this pocket watch has not lost a second (a month or more) Ease of winding: very easy, whether it is normal or not) The time setting method is the same as most non-digital watches. You can see how expensive all the other watches this company makes are (up to a thousand R some)) All in all a great watch, I would recommend it to anyone. Despite my limited budget, I do not regret this purchase.