Review on Camera Nikon D3400 Kit AF-P DX 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6G VR, black by Amit Kumar ᠌

In terms of ergonomics, it clearly loses to canons, it’s worth learning how to make buttons, put a rotary touch display, make a comfortable handle. I understand people who prefer canon, it’s clearly more convenient to use. Despite the cons, this is at least a good camera that I can recommend to beginner amateur photographers, as well as those who have a limited budget. The quality of the photo is not inferior to the older models D5500 and D5600, and in some places even better. Even in dxomark, this camera has a higher rating than the above-mentioned older models. I took it with an 18-55 af-p II lens, the lens is good: from the pluses, compared to the old version, it has an absolutely quiet focus mode and now the video is inaudible. but it also has disadvantages: small diameter and low aperture. In the future I plan to buy a cheap TV set like 70-300. According to dxomark site tests, nikon is an order of magnitude better than canon. This is true: I have a canon 750d and nikon d3400, and the pictures on nikon are really better than on canon, although canon is 10 thousand more expensive ! Well, by the way, the pictures were taken on approximately the same optics on the canon was stock 18-55 is stm 3,5-5,6 on nikon 18-55 vr af-p II 3,5-5,6. Nikon has more accurate and richer color reproduction, less noise, more accurate focusing